Too many of the potential jurors said that even if the defendant, Elisa Meadows, was guilty, they were unwilling to issue the $500 fine a city attorney was seeking, said Ren Rideauxx, Meadows’ attorney.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Weird how it works. The one time I got jury duty I was ready to nullify and got given a case where the accused was accused of a raping a 11 year old.

      Hmm I don’t think I am going to nullify that particular law. Sounds like a good one to keep on the books.

      They rejected me anyhow, guess the defense didn’t want a parent of young daughters on the jury for some strange reason

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Whenever they call up jurors for drug trials where I’m at they’ll inevitably end up throwing out most of the pool because even trials related to legit scum who are peddling the life ruining stuff can be derailed by the Legalize it Campaign apparently

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Just because you think the law is bad doesn’t mean you like criminals. They are unrelated. A morally good person can be a criminal, a shitty human being could always be following the law.

          Nullify bad laws.

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah that’s the rub though, I don’t trust people to decide what the bad laws are given which ones they’ve done it for previously.

            The bad laws that get nullified tend to be a lot less impactful than the good ones that get nullified,

            The practical application of it historically has convinced me that nullification is something akin to the death penalty,

            There are without a doubt cases where it ought to be applied, but I do not at all trust my fellow humans to be capable and consistent judges of those circumstances.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah but here’s the thing, if they can prove you knowingly steered the jury towards nullification post selection they’ll prosecute you for perjury because the screening questions basically total up to “Would you nullify a guilty verdict? Yes or No?”, so doing it on purpose and being too obvious about it can get you put in front of your own jury.