• Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I have found a lot of websites over the last few months acting up if I’m using Firefox.

      I have chrome for work and if I switch they work flawlessly. It’s small things like menus not expanding or elements not loading.

      There’s a push on unifying browsers.

      I’ve been Firefox and duckduckgo for years and it’s getting a bit annoying. Obviously the trade off is worth it I do not want the big tech products but finding good alternatives is getting hard.

      DDG has gone downhill in recent years.

      • egerlach@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        DDG has gone downhill in recent years.

        Not as much as Google though, so I’ve been feeling like it’s been getting better and better, but it’s just a comparative feeling.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          To me it’s worrying because it is where Google was when I jumped ship for DDG.

          I am getting tailored results that I do not want. Everything I search even with location off gives me local to very local responses.

          If I open a link and then go back to the results page all the results have changed order.

        • Jojo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Not a very big website, but the service my therapist uses for teletherapy doesn’t support anything outside of chromium.

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            I don’t want you to post personal stuff but that’s still just “it doesn’t work” with no proof

            • Jojo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Well, it’s a specific example, even if I didn’t give any way to test it. Better than just saying “some websites don’t work” since I’m actually indicating the particular one that doesn’t.

              I guess your two options are to trust that I’m acting in good faith when I say it or to assume I might not be and disregard the example. Either way doesn’t affect me much; I’ve already submitted tickets to the service asking for Firefox support, so with any luck it won’t even be an issue for too long.

              • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                After a ton of “Firefox sucks because a website doesn’t work but I won’t tell you which one”

                I don’t care to think anyone saying they is saying it in good faith

        • Alyxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I couldn’t submit a support ticket for id.me (the IRS’ stupid commercial partner for Identity verification) when using Firefox, the submit button literally did not work. Worked fine when switching to edge (blegh).

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I just gave you an example of menus not expanding.

          I’m not digging Firefox I’m saying there is a consorted effort made to reduce it’s usefulness.

        • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Example: The meeting webservice my bank uses is for whatever reason blocked for Firefox. Not sure if they just User-Agent check but they consciously block out Firefox users. I alerted my bank person about that but I doubt that’s going to be any different next time I have a meeting with them.

          • scutiger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Are you sure that’s not an ad/tracker-blocking issue?

            I’ve seen this on twitch, for example. Trying to log in with trackers blocked will throw up a dialog saying “your browser is not supported,” but if you allow tracking, it works fine. And once logged in, you can block trackers again and the site continues to work normally.

            • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Nope they explicitly state in their support forums that they do not support Firefox and the Error Message you get recommends using Edge or Chrome. This is not an Ad-Block problem

        • Nyanix@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Wow, that random news article I hit 16 days ago where the page kept flickering and reloading, but didn’t do that when I copied the URL into Brave… I really should’ve recorded that domain so I could defend myself against some stranger online!

          Sarcasm aside, I don’t think it’s generally the major websites that you bump into this with, however, there are many edge cases that occur for plenty of folks, whether they’re in college and have to use that “secure browser” extension that only supports Chrome, or the fact that some websites, especially in business, that simply refuse to support browser and will prevent access otherwise.

          I’m a Firefox user, so this isn’t to say that Chromium is the way by any means, but hopefully to shine a little light on the fact that we’re all on different parts of the web with different experiences, questioning their experiences so that you can hopefully find an extension or something to pin the blame them does not absolve them of their experience, just a show of elitism.

          Firefox HAS gotten much better, but unfortunately, Capitalism’s gonna Capitalism

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Oh noooo a random shit news site doesn’t load good cuz they don’t do web design good

            Still no examples

            • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              why are you being so abrasive?

              Of course web sites not working on firefox is an error on the web sites part, was that even in question?

              • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Because I’ve seen this over and over again and it’s always the same. Nobody has replied with a single URL, just vague anecdotes.

        • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I can think of 2 websites that didn’t work right over the past 10 Yeats. Both were credit card payment sites and just had weird issues like couldn’t hit the submit button. I figured it out and just used edge for them. I never found any site that I use often that has issues yet.

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            “I can think of”

            no proof

            No personal stuff obviously but nobody actually has proof

        • flying_gel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I use Firefox on Linux and FreeBSD for my daily driver.

          I was not able to book flights on Thai airways website 6 months ago until I loaded it in chrome/chromium instead.

          It’s really really rare imo but that’s one example in recent history.

          • snooggums@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            That sounds more like an issue with them using some proprietary browser bullshit than a problem with Firefox.

            • Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 years ago

              But what, practically, is the difference? If more and more websites use shit that only works in Chrome or Chromium based browsers, the effect is the same. The web doesn’t work as well for Firefox users.

              • snooggums@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                One is a browser following web standards and the other is a shitty company adding non-standards based development features intended to lock users into there browsers.

                It was shitty when Microsoft did the non-standard features to lock in with Internet Exporer and it is shitty that Chrome does it now.

                • Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  It’s shitty for sure, and I definitely think Chrome needs to die, or at least have better competition. Sadly, not enough users are using non-chromium browsers, that they don’t see a problem with using chrome only features. It sucks, and it’s going to lead (is leading) to the further enshitification of the web. I’m doing my part by using Firefox, and any web application I develop is guaranteed to work in Firefox.

        • Jojo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Oh, and I can’t seem to get tiktok videos to play on Firefox on Android? Not a major issue, but my sister keeps sending them to me in particular for some reason, so…

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I’ve always had TikTok blocked so I maybe o idea about that

            Also a privacy browser not allowing the least private thing ever? Colour me shocked

      • UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        DDG has gone downhill in recent years.

        I haven’t noticed this at all.

        I’ve been a frequent DDG g! bang user over the years, but now almost never have to go it. Granted I use kagi for most searches now, but my phone still defaults to DDG, and I’ve noticed that it works just fine.

        Google and therefore kagi are still better for stackoverflow indexing I believe, at least that’s how I remember it

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          What is DDG g! Bang?

          Yeah it is really odd I can’t understand why it does it because the initial reason I moved to DDG was because of their big marketing push on not putting results or users into bubbles.

                • Squizzy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Does it prevent Google from getting your info or something so or what is the benefit in this over using Google?

                  • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    There is no modification, it’s just a handy shortcut, read about bangs here. You are not expected to use !g for all searches, only for those that you wish to search with Google. It’s also possible to replicate this with browser search settings, DDG just has this built-in.

        • LibreFish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Brave may be persona non Grata around here, but props to them for actually crawling the web. Just about every other private search engine uses APIs from Google/Bing or scrapes/proxies results from other search engines.

          • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah exactly, and its the only private search engine that actually gives me good results for tech troubleshooting, although if another private browser gets equivalent results I’m jumping ship immediately

    • DingoBilly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Honestly, I’ve tried switching but can’t find a browser that works as well. I found Kiwi Browser on Android which is still chromium based but at least it’s something, but still need to use Chrome from time to time as websites won’t work on Kiwi.

      Firefox just doesn’t perform as well comparatively, lacks features and then as you go down the list of alternatives it gets worse and worse.

      So not from lack of trying, but at least for me it is the best browser particularly if you can install enough extensions to remove a lot of garbage.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not to sound snarky, but what are you missing from Firefox that chrome does?

        • Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          They won’t answer, because they can’t answer.

          For me, I’ve noticed a few websites that complain that firefox “is an out of date browser, you should use something more modern”. My bank’s website does that, but still works fine as far as I’ve been able to tell.

          • Bizarroland@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I have a couple of websites that I go to that do not like working in Firefox but work just fine in Chromium browsers.

            The worst offender is Microsoft admin 365. It will open, and it will work, but if you edit a user and save your edits you can’t click on the back button inside of the window that has popped up for editing and instead you have to close the entire section and reopen it to go back to the main screen.

            Aside from that, for netdocs you have to open the local host port of your netdocs app in firefox (https://localhost:(port number)) and approve to bypass the security restrictions in order for netdocs to work.

            There are a handful of another apps with similar issues and most of them are from software vendors that I have to use for work.

            There’s one that I can’t mention because it would dox me that if you don’t use it in Chrome it simply does not work because the JavaScript that they use for generating the app checks to see if you are in a Chrome browser and straight up fails if the user agent does not return Chrome.

            I can work around that for myself but I can’t work around that for all 17,000 of our employees, and since the entire business runs on this application then we are locked in.