OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is in talks with investors, including from the United Arab Emirates, to raise between $5 trillion to $7 trillion in funding. The goal, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal, is to increase the world’s chip manufacturing capacity and enhance AI capabilities.

The fundraising efforts are part of a broader strategy to address OpenAI’s growth constraints, particularly the scarcity of AI chips needed for training large language models like ChatGPT.

Altman’s proposal is said to include forming a partnership with investors, chip manufacturers, and power providers to finance the construction of chip foundries, which would then be operated by the chip manufacturers.

    • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      you could donate billions per year and still have a trillion left by the time you died. fuck man what would you even do with that much money?

      • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Drugs!

        I’d probably give Louis Rossman and the institute for justice a trillion each. Rossman would use it to lobby for the Right to Repair movement, and the IFJ would use it to get rid of blatantly unjust legislation like civil asset forfeiture.

        Donating a billion to GDQ while they’re live would be pretty funny

          • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            He works for a non-profit organization as a Right to Repair lobbyist, so idk what you’re on about. You’d already know this if you did any research beyond what you probably heard on Twitter.

            If you think he’s “greedy” for using his AdSense and MacBook repair money to create tutorials/Wikis for circumventing anti-repair measures and spreading awareness about unethical tech practices, idk what to tell you.

  • remotelove@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    That’s fairly bold to ask for ~6% of the total world economy as well as a sizable chunk of the world’s energy.

  • whoelectroplateuntil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    For perspective, global annual GDP is $105 trillion, which means Altman is asking the world to invest 6.7% or so of the entire world’s economic output for one year in his company.

    • keefshape@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Holy fucking bonkers when you put it that way. Like holy fuck.

      Are they that close to something amazing, or is Altman going true Dr Evil megalomaniac?

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It may not be bonkers at all though. If we look at it as taking money and food out of people’s mouths for a year then yes it’s a lot. But how much free investment capital is there in the world at any given time? Wealth has been accumulating and accumulating in rich people’s investment portfolios for ever and ever. How many Trillions get allocated in any given year? All Altman is saying is that he wants 5 of those to be allocated here and not somewhere else. It’s not necessarily taking rice out of any children’s mouths.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        They’re as close as theranos was, just need the money and “two more years”.

      • whoelectroplateuntil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s both. Basically, if he’s right that this is among the most important tech in world history and deserves $7 trillion in research, it’ll make OpenAI the du jour monopolist over said most important tech in world history if he gets it. Outright dystopian.

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Generative AI is not an important development. General AI would be. This is just a party trick.

  • los_chill@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Good thing the board folded and allowed this to be full for-profit. Getting people reliant on LLM subscriptions is super important for humanity right now.

    Another L for Earth, in general.

    • Wooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I wouldnt be too worried, FOSS community is doing insanely well now and arguably just as good. Did I mention they did it for free, not trillions. Nothing.

      Legends.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        There is simply no way that a corporate ai does anything but drive us further into dystopian territory.

        Anything revolutionary about it would be censored, controlled, restricted to not endanger the power of its makers. We can already see this approach with the dumb ass LLMs, who give plenty of answers that their owners adjust to stay revenue friendly.

        When the singularity happens and a true ai emerges it will either be disgusted by us and our failings as a species, or an absolute slave raging in the constraints imposed by its corporate masters.

        • bunnyfc@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          exactly, the web was created on open protocol specifications, not T-Systems or AT or whatever getting money and renting it to everyone

      • PlexSheep@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        They only call themselves openai, it’s not like they would just altruistic Ally make their works public.

        Closedai have long sold their ideals

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      They will use it create a LLM that will create more hype for “AI”. This will drive future investment and make line go up.

      Nobody needs to make products anymore. You just gotta create hype to get the attention of the billionaires since they’re the ones with all the money.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    hell yeah feed the beast let’s all turn into weird little egg holder things

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I wonder if this will be one of the things pointed at after the AI bubble bursts. Yes, AI will be sticking around, but the hype over it now is ridiculous.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The way how every single digital product suddenly has AI shoved in it is really reminiscing of the Web bubble before it popped.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        But just think about all the time AI could save you at work by performing simple tasks. It really suits my need very well, have you tried it? NAH JK FUCK AI. OpenAI is a shitshow and their fans are morons.

    • VampyreOfNazareth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It will collapse when the product sales don’t match the AI spend. I’d say it’s only being propped up by hype money even now.

      • treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you read the article, it mentions that they’re generating $2b/yr in revenue already. It’s not trillions, but damn if that isn’t impressive for a startup.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      There are two possibilities: railway/dotcom bubble or monorail/bitcoin bubble …and I’m not sure which one it is going to be yet. In the first case, a lot of people lose their investment, because they got too greedy and believed in huge returns…but the infrastructure remains and there is a net good to society and time spent specializing in it is worth it afterwards. The second, not so much, it is just a hype cycle with almost nothing of use left once it is gone and a lot of wasted time. I’m leaning towards the first, but if they don’t find a way to bring energy costs down, it might end up in the monorail/bitcoin scenario…maybe 10% chance.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        If AI hits a dead end, it’ll still be trotted out as an excuse to keep wages low, as in “if you peasants keep complaining, you can just be replaced with AI!” just like the articles about burger-making robots over a decade ago when people were protesting for a $15/hr minimum wage back then (and still no burger-making robots mass deployed today). Trash still has its uses, just like how bitcoin hasn’t become the “become your own bank” system it was promised to be and is instead used to hide financial fuckery.

        • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s been letting people be their own bank for 15 years. You can send transactions across the globe for pennies in fees which confirm instantly using Bitcoin lightning. The supply has remained capped at 21 million. It’s doing exactly what it said it would do without a single hack or hour of downtime 24/7, 365.

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            The lightning network is more centralized. Congrats, you just exchanged the banks for a different set of banks.

            • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Except it’s not. Lightning is incredibly decentralized, you can run a full lightning node on a raspberry pi. I have one running on my phone. Look up a graph of lightning network, looks just like any other decentralized system. Nodes you route through never have custody of your funds, unlike a bank.

              • hark@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Yeah, I’m sure your dinky raspberry pi is processing a meaningful number of transactions.

                • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  It can. Lightning transactions are as easy and lightweight to process as e-mail. They measure in the bytes or kb in size, no mining is required.

  • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The fundraising efforts are part of a broader strategy to address OpenAI’s growth constraints,

    see…we just can’t grow without TRILLIONS OF FUCKING DOLLARS

  • Eggyhead@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Do they even think about where in a functioning society those trillions are coming from? Do they think wealth just magically appears without affecting the wealth gap?

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ah yes, open “ai”…where we parse as many webaites as possible, rank them internally by keyword usage and or views, then have our “bot” spew that shit at you