• Yliaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        If he’s literally fucked without consent, what makes people think he wouldn’t figuratively fuck the people collectively without it too?

    • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      One that do-nothing Americans have done nothing but tacitly encourage.

      Get off your asses, you fucking cowards. Though, this is like the thirtieth red line. You let all the others be crossed without lifting a finger- I have zero confidence you’ll start now.

        • VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yes I moved all investment out of the USA and stopped buying american products as much as possible. Fuck USA and it’s Epstein class supporting citizens !

        • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’m assuming you’re American, because it’s very on-brand for Americans to expect someone else to fix their shit for them while they sit by and do nothing (thereby making it everyone else’s problem)

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            You said:

            One that do-nothing Americans have done nothing but tacitly encourage.

            Get off your asses, you fucking cowards. Though, this is like the thirtieth red line.

            So you don’t get to claim “on-brand american” exceptionalism “expecting someone else to fix their shit.”

            You threw the first shots, I quipped back. This isn’t “Someone else needs to fix our problems,” this is “If you’re not doing anything to fix everybody’s problem, then shut the fuck up about all the people you think aren’t doing enough.” You have no moral superiority, so get off your fucking pedestal.

            Plenty of USians are doing all they can to resist. Just because it isn’t enough doesn’t mean no one is trying. So why don’t you direct your anger at maga specifically, instead of all the powerless discontents who are doing everything they can despite the hopelessness

            • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              3 days ago

              “Your country probably sucks”

              Interesting how US liberals start sounding like MAGA when someone reminds them that good intentions on their own aren’t sufficient.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    this is what you get when you elect piss hitler. Next is annexation of greenland and after that likely ww3 if people continue to be apathetic.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    He is fully entitled to a third, life-term in prison for being a traitor. I hear Epstein’s cell is empty.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      I used to advocate for a life terms for the top MAGAs. That was after the first term, the Insurrection, and the stolen classified documents. After this second term, capital punishment is on the table.

      They should have quit while they were ahead.

      • sen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        Comments like this are what keep getting me banned on Reddit, but I’ll keep saying it on every platform:

        Pedophiles get the rope. Pedophile protectors can swing alongside them. Insurrectionists and traitors get the firing squad. ICE gets to bleed out slowly.

      • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        I was honestly surprised when I heard the jan 6 people crying about how unfair it is that they got prison. Generally speaking, no matter who’s wrong or right, attacking the palace/capitol/whatever tends to end in death.

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          I got permabanned for REPEATING a comment that I had posted multiple times before without incident. Once Trump was inaugurated, however, I was immediately permabanned.

          My comment said something like: “Trump and his henchmen are really lucky we live in such a forgiving country. In most countries, at most times in history, on the evening of a failed coup, the traitors would have been dragged out onto the front lawn of the White House, and publicly executed, every last one of them.”

          I wasn’t saying we should do that, I was saying that they were lucky that we didn’t. It was a simple fact, but I was permabanned anyway.

  • apple_train@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    When will the American public use the guns they’ve been hording to protect themselves against tyranny, against the tyranny?

    • JillSteinsPuckeredAnus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      they dont see conservatives as tyrants. Conservatism is a team-based ideology. Those on the team have leave to break the law with impunity, and are even lauded for it. It only becomes a problem with progressive liberals try to do it, then it’s wrong and worthy of insurrection.

    • Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Y’all gotta make sure term length can’t be redefined

      You’re going to end up with presidential term limits like copywrite law

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        article II, section 1, paragraph 1 of the Constitution of the United States of America:

        The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows:

        It’s not even in an amendment, it’s defined in the original text. No way he gets enough states together to ratify an amendment to increase his term length.

        • 4am@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          The 22nd amendment of the United states constitution, fully ratified in 1951, begins as such:

          No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

          Term length is set to four years for the President and his VP in Article II, Section 1 of the constitution itself (original text) and has not been amended or altered.

          Trump needs 38 state legislatures to ratify an amendment, he doesn’t and won’t ever have that.

    • tomkatt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      To Trump: Technically Constitutionally, you’re NOT entitled to a third term, as you’re inelligible to run for a third term. Sincerely, all Americans

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    European here. Is a third term actually illegal/unconstitutional or is it “just” defacto illegal/unconstitutional?

    • jve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s the 22nd Amendment

      No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once

      Pretty unambiguous.

      Extending his rein would mean he either Stops Elections, gets the constitution amended, or most insidious… just refuses to transfer power, and seeing if our military is actually complicit with the pedophile class against its own citizenry.

      Jan 6 is going to completely embolden them to try again. Is there enough MAGA to make it happen again despite it all?

      EDIT: extended rant

    • osanna@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I believe an amendment to the constitution forbids it, but I’m not 100% sure

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    So, is our military going to need to step up to ensure a fair election next year, and also prevent Trump from taking office again? That is, assuming he, A) lives that long, and B) somehow pulls this off. Isn’t that why they are required to swear an oath to the Constitution, and not the President? Does that actually hold any water?

    • obvs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      115
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Look, if the U.S. Military were going to uphold the Constitution he already wouldn’t be President anymore.

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Eh. I mean he is clearly shitting all over norms, blatantly corrupt, most likely treasonous, and robbing the fucking treasury blind, but all of that stuff is Congress’s responsibility to hold him accountable and draw lines and they have failed.

        I don’t know if you can point to any part of the constitution that he has clearly violated. But the two term limit is codified. The supreme clutter doesn’t need to weigh in, the stupidest motherfucker in the country can do the math to see it’s unconstitutional (they might not care, but they can see it).

        If folks want to toss the constitution, great, they just tossed the basis of authority for the President, Congress, and the Supreme Court. Guess we get to writing a new one.

        I hesitate to declare this is the line he won’t be allowed to cross, because he’s sailed over every other one. But I really think the entire system of government is shot if he does this. We would certainly be a failed state at that point, where right now we are kinda Schrödinger’s Failed State. We may already be, but we’ll have to measure it post Trump.

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          4 days ago

          I mean he’s clearly broken the first amendment more than a few times by ordering the government to pressure organizations over their right to free speech.

          Also, constitutional problems with his deportation bullshit. Which he’s been ordered not to do, and yet they’re still doing it.

        • ClownStatue@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s very important to make the distinction between Congress failing to hold him accountable and declining to. In the first case Congress is ineffective. In the second, and current situation, it is willfully inept. Big difference.

          I’m getting tired of all these assholes calling Americans cowards for not rioting in the streets every day and erecting a guillotine on the ellipse! They tried that during the George Floyd fallout, and the right was quite successful in vilifying them. It was only the glaring racism of Trump’s first term that revitalized BLM. His second term has effectively quashed that as well, somehow.

          The US population is effectively a hostage, and this started long before Trump. Their livlihoods are financially bound to their employment, which is precarious at best. I’ve said it elsewhere and I’ll say it many more times: US citizens, particularly the ones in the upper-middle class are going to have to be willing to die. It’s that simple. If the population “rises up” like all the internet idiots want them to, Trump will implement the Insurrection Act ASAP. The aforementioned willfully inept Congress is highly unlikely to stop him. That’s going to result in one or both of a lot of dead citizens or a civil war.

          All of this brings me to the midterm elections. Americans are facing the shit sandwich of the current criminal and his willing accomplices in Congress, and the Democrats who:

          • Aside from 2 weak funding fights, have refused to act as an opposition party in anywhere near the same manner as the GOP when they’re in the minority.
          • Are largely funded by the same authoritarians friendly billionaires and tech bros.
          • Are unlikely to behave like an opposition party even if the manage to win back both houses of Congress, which is not super likely.

          I think a lot of Americans are hoping things improve after the midterms, and I hope they’re right. I don’t think its going to happen, but I think plenty of people are looking for a reason to not risk their livelihoods, or lives. And that’s what its going to be. This criminal has no care for anyone but himself. He has no compassion or empathy. He sees US citizens the same way the worst Kings and Emperors of old did: as expendable. If they get “uppity,” he will not lose a wink of sleep ordering the military, National Guard, ICE, police forces, or any armed body he can control to open fire on them. Whether they will or not is a massive question most rational people don’t want to see asked.

          The US is effectively being run by a mad king, and whatever safeguards used to be in place for such a situation are either complicit, or ineffectual (ie, the courts). People are really hoping that a Dem “wave” in the midterms will somehow fix something. Like I said, I hope they’re right.

          • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            We are effectively a dictatorship right now and the only thing that can reverse that is if Trump fails to act fast enough or acts so fast he gets heavy pushback. This far they have been effective at letting the most right-wing elements dominate the media so by the time they do crazy shit the people have already sort of absorbed the idea and it doesn’t seem outlandish.

            He can ignore the courts in the event that they act fast enough to matter. He controls the military and can simply blockade polling locations, cut off power, etc. He can at least fuck with an election to the point where the ordinary safeguards against vote fraud can’t be ensured. He has all the tools needed to end democracy here.

            The question is whether enough people will be complicit. Speaker Johnson will just declare he hasn’t read the news until the coup is complete. But will none of the freedom-loving conservatives think twice about throwing away freedom? Epstein is creating cracks. It would be easy for Trump to fuck up and overplay his hand, but unfortunately he will win unless he makes an error.

            But he also needs to move fairly fast. There is a lot of inertia in the way the system is built and if he moves too slowly, it’s game over for him (well it’s two years of playing defense). It takes time to replace everyone with sycophants.

            I’m optimistic. I’m also 70 miles from Canada, if worse comes to worst.

            US citizens, particularly the ones in the upper-middle class are going to have to be willing to die

            I’m not some kind of super-patriot, but I’m a former soldier. I swore an oath to protect my country from enemies foreign and domestic, and that… weighs on me, despite how easy it would be to just enjoy old white guy status. I’m also old and out of shape and I have no illusions how it will end if it comes to that. But I’ve also lived a good life. If that’s the end to which I’m fated… we can only do what we can in the situation we find ourselves in. Sometimes there is no winning scenario, you just do what you must.

            Are there more like me? I don’t know. My wife would let the country burn if it kept her family safe. I don’t know anyone else thinking about things (aloud) the way I do and maybe they will let the world burn, too. But I won’t. In 40 years I’ll be dead one way or another, and 40 years later my life won’t even be a memory. And the only thing that will exist of me is whatever has rippled out into the world from my actions. I won’t have the failure of America be my only enduring legacy. That said, there is time and runway before that becomes inevitable, and I have hope.

          • [object Object]@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            I keep getting amused by how for three years USians cried that Russians should’ve rioted and ousted Putin, and now for the past year “it’s complicated”.

            • ClownStatue@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              Well, anyone saying Russians should vote Putin out aren’t paying attention. Their elections haven’t been legit since he rose to power. As for why they haven’t kicked him out, it actually is complicated.

        • oyo@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          You can’t point to something he’s clearly violated? What? The most obvious and clear example is the emoluments clause, but it’s easy to add in the first and fourth amendments. (Preference given to Christianity, and search and seizure without probable cause, as examples.)

          • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Let me clarify my point. Those are all abstract things that require Congress or the Supreme Court to step in and draw lines. We’ve had in god we trust as the national motto for decades. There is a gray area there that can be argued and low-engagement voters just see it as noise.

            But everyone can count to three. Everyone knows you get two terms and no more. Everyone knows you have to win an election to be President. It is unequivocal. Inarguable. So I think it carries weight in a way that those other violations of the constitution have not.

            I never meant to create ambiguity around his illegal actions, just draw attention to how this act would be distinct from the rest.

        • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          4 days ago

          the stupidest motherfucker in the country can do the math to see it’s unconstitutional

          It’s not at all unconstitutional for Trump to enjoy a third term as president. All the Constitution says is that he can’t be elected a third time. There’s nothing that says he cannot run as VP and then succeed into POTUS once Vance steps down.

          • obvs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            3 days ago

            Sounds like you’ve read Amendment 22:

            No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

            But you definitely haven’t read Amendment 12:

            But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

            No, the bullshit technicality he’s trying to pull out of his ass is still unconstitutional.

            • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

              You really think this is bulletproof?

              Have Trump run for Speaker. Hell, have him appointed as secretary of agriculture and have the people above resign. Its really not that difficult when your constitution is held together with bubblegum and pinky promises.

              There is nothing in the constitution that says he cant enjoy a third term.

          • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            4 days ago

            That’s not true. If a vice president assumes the office, that still counts as a term even though he’s not elected. I also believe there is a stipulation that no one disqualified from holding the presidency can be VP, though idk what is spelled out and what is just interpretation.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        dictators fear most is a strong military that can initate a coup de tat anytime, thats why almost all countries with a dictator have very weak militaries, but a strong well funded secret police state.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well if we want to really go into constitutional interp, the military has no power to remove a sitting president.

        But if elections do not occur a person doesn’t continue to be the president, additionally a 3rd term is banned by the constitution.

        If Trump were to “cancel” elections, a power he doesn’t even have, the law is clear. He would still lose the presidency. It would then pass to the speaker of the house per the constitutional line of succession.

        At that point the military would have a choice to make.

        Of course these are big ifs, laws only matter if they are followed. And this scenario requires the law to be broken to even occur. Shits bad

        • obvs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          The military literally takes an oath to uphold the Constitution.

          Donald Trump is wiping his ass with the Constitution. There couldn’t be anything more Contritutional for the military to do.

          • arrow74@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I don’t remember a single line in the Constitution stating the military has the power to remove a sitting president.

            At least the scenario I described was constitutional.

            That’s the neat part about an oath to the Constitution, you can’t break it to save it. That would be outside of that very oath.

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The military? Probably not…

      But you might get a federal agency already cosplaying as a para-military group to overlook the election and make sure you’re voting correctly. 👍

      • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        The governor of every state has the right to call out that state’s National Guard in the event of emergencies, and it is my sincere hope the states start to do it pre-emptively, NOW, even via state legislation, so that the NG are already under orders to protect the polls by the time November rolls around.

        Without the NG, he has nothing tested and true but ICE, and their numbers are shit compared to the National Guard.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          ICE’s training is also nonexistent. The only thing they’re effective at is terrorizing and occasionally murdering unarmed civilians.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Does that actually hold any water?

      Apparently not as they’re all having fun bombing Iran without congress’s approval.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 days ago

        Every single person in the military swore an oath to defend the Constitution from all enemies foreign AND DOMESTIC.

        Domestic enemies like Donald Trump pose a much greater threat to our country than any conventional combatant with a gun or missile - the military is already oath-bound to engage him the same way they do any other enemy.

        The inaction from them so far doesn’t paint a very promising picture regarding their willingness to actually do what’s right to protect our country; but we also don’t need the entire military to unite against that traitor: we just need a single one of them with the right training to apply through skills.

        Servicemen and women: please actually do your job.

        • arjuna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          you obviously have no idea what “do your job” means here… military are trained to kill, do you really want them to “do their job” in US streets?

          • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            you obviously have no idea what “do your job” means here…

            Don’t conflate ‘doing their job’ with the misuse of force they’re famous for. We need them to do their actual job, not just blindly follow orders into a series of war crimes.

            military are trained to kill, do you really want them to “do their job” in US streets?

            Yes, contingent on those streets being populated by enemies of the US like Donald Trump / members of his regime / ICE.

            • arjuna@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              3 days ago

              you seem to be conflating military with police. you want them wantonly murdering Americans in the street? stfu lunatic.

          • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            You’re sorta missing the point. Nobody is talking about having the military issuing parking tickets here.

            It’s about Trump running for office, and Congress/the courts saying “no”.

            Who does the military listen to? Do they obey Trump’s orders to enforce his will at polling places?

    • criscodisco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe he can go up on a debate stage and talk about how the security of Israel is vital to American interests in the region.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Because Joe Biden cheated!”

    “So what you’re saying is you deserve a term to replace the one you lost in 2020?”

    “Yes!”