• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    And they still haven’t even finished making PowerShell anywhere near as functional as Bash or any other Linux shell environment. First version of PowerShell came out exactly 10 years after the first version of NT.

    I don’t outright hate PowerShell but it’s clearly a hacky afterthought after realizing Linux was eating their lunch in the server space via quick rollouts to thousands of computers at once through Bash scripting.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      I find PS pretty great. Probably the best improvement to Windows since going 32-bit.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        For sure, it’s a vast improvement, but there’s still so much you can’t do with it.

        Mostly because unlike Bash and DOS, which are CLIs that get GUIs slapped on top, PowerShell is a CLI slapped on top of a GUI.

        • greybeard@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I disagree, you can do almost anything with powershell. There isn’t always an exact command for it, but like 95% of Windows configuration lives in the registry. If you know what to change, you can make powershell manage any setting. Which is similar to the way that Bash controls Linux, through modifying config files.

          I do wish they had more/better tools for configuring the OS, but it works pretty well if you know the arcane magic of Windows.

          And when it comes to being a functional script, I’d take powershell over bash any day. That’s preference, obviously, but objects instead of strings makes it way easier to move data from one process to another.