(TikTok screencap)

    • All Ice In Chains@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Mobile surveillance stations. Typically solar powered with a backup battery, and the inevitably monstrous result of surveillance capitalism.

  • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    The first time I saw one of these was at a Fourth of July gathering in a public park. I saw the high blue lights and I figured it was marking some kind of portable police resource center. I had imagined some basic first aid and some officers ready for emergency assistance. I had imagined something that was partly a service and partly community outreach. I had imagined something with positive features.

    I was so disappointed to find out it was just cameras. Quite an emotional trip in my head there, from “We’re here to help!” to “We’re watching you, fuckers” in the space of a moment.

    But I guess the cops in my suburb are no better than the cops in any other suburb.

  • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s one of these in a shopping center around me. I flip it off every time I see it.

    I mean, I deliberately drive near it, stop, roll down my window, put my arm out, and flip it off very intentionally.

    I don’t care if it knows me. I’ve made no secret of my hatred for authoritarianism throughout my life. I’ve gone to more protests than I can count. Besides, if authorities really wanted to do something to me, they’d readily make things up anyway. They don’t need an excuse, so I might as well express myself.

    This shit is dystopian as fuck and every time I see it or it blasts out its message about us being watched, it boils my blood.

    Fuck it all. This is not okay.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      . . .flip it off very intentionally.

      Heehee I’m kinda glad I’m not alone here. I walk my neighborhood and people install those STUPID cameras facing the sidewalk to catch EVERYONE walking by, that whistle at you, or say “you are being recorded!”

      I give it the finger without looking at it basically as a reflex now. I’ve never even flipped someone off in traffic, I’ve been told I have the patience of a saint.

      But surveillance capitalism and stupid paranoid suburbanites satisfying their nosy-neighbor compulsions is definitely a line.

      We’ve got those stupid towers all over the place here too. Construction sites, parking lots.

      Freaking absurd. I’m upset that it’s the best crime deterrent they can come up with, because I suppose skulky fellows lurking around dark parking lots aren’t preferable either.

    • nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah we’ve got a bunch of these in our neighborhood. It’s a rundown area but this just makes it worse. I’d love nothing more than to mask up and smash this shit

      • Fluke@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        *Mask up and disassemble that shit for parts on the spot. Make it serve the people, rather than spy on them.

    • Janx@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      141
      ·
      2 days ago

      They really are. I visit a location with one of these regularly  and a pleasant loudspeaker says “Welcome to [shopping area], please report any disturbances” and I immediately feel like I’m in Half-Life, or another dystopian video game…

      • fishy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        The ones by me play loud classical music at night to keep homeless from setting up camp. Nothing makes me feel more safe at night than loud classical music. Just kidding it always makes me feel like a slasher movie killer is just a few feet behind me.

        Probably the most dystopian thing I’ve ever experienced IRL.

      • expatriado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        the aperture laboratories vibes, i get those when i visit old power plants for work, just by the looks

    • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 days ago

      It costs less than 10 dollars to disable them.

      It also costs about negative 1200 to steal them.

      It costs infinitely more to do nothing.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        What even are these? I’m not American, we don’t torture (or have) crackheads here. I mean we do have bums, but hard drugs are too expensive and hard to find for then I think. Booze is easy.

        Anyway, in case anyone here is thinking of their local community’s wellbeing, idk what it’s like in the US with tariffs and all, but I know that in general it’s like 30 bucks off Aliexpress to get a cordless angle grinder that works with Makita batteries. Maybe 50 with a battery and charger included. Yes, they work.

        • Saurok@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s like portable CCTV. Police cameras. They can move them to wherever the crime is basically.

        • ExtremeUnicorn@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I would like to know as well, if only since if it’s done in the US, it won’t be too long until we get it over here.

          I mean, this obviously looks like some kind of mobile general suspicion surveillance system, but what’s the official story?

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            The official story is that it’s mobile general surveillance to deter crime.

            They’re very open that it’s a surveillance system that watches everyone and records everything.

            https://www.lvt.com/

            They’re a little less open about how open they are with police or exactly how much they can correlate everything with other data. Most people don’t have an intuitive feel for how easy it is to piece together a lot about their lives from some small measurements when tied to everyone else’s, so they just stop at being annoyed by the lights and sometimes fucking commercials.

  • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    They aren’t common in the places I typically shop, at least not yet.

    So, around here, when you see these, you know you’re in an unsafe part of town, so they’re essentially a huge advertisement to go shop some place safer and nicer. The privacy invasion aspect of it isn’t even really the biggest factor in regards to where I spend my money.

  • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hate it. It’s so annoying. The stores in the area hate it because it pisses people off and they complain to the stores and them the stores are like we hate them as well but the cops put them there.

    • NannerBanner@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      I once had the lovely privilege of listening to a police higher up (lieutenant or something?) happily crow about setting these things up. I was just trying not to scoff as he said it was super effective, and yet his little slideshow showed absolutely diddly squat in any changes in the metrics they were using.

      • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        They’re more annoying than the guy who use to setup a speaker and and do busking in the parking lot. At least he provided some kind of service and not…that.

    • Sunflier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      the stores are like we hate them as well but the cops put them there.

      If they’re on a store’s parkinglot, they’re trespassing if they’re there without the store’s consent. That means they can be removed.

        • Sunflier@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Even if they are tenants to a lease, the doctrine of quiet enjoyment would prohibit a landlord from being able to freely agree to having police property sitting on the store’s parking lot if their lease covers the parking lot. It’s kinda like renting a house with a yard: your lease is for the house and the yard surrounding the house. A landlord cannot just come on top the lawn and start ripping it up without the tenant’s permission.

          • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Regardless it’s the people working at the store who don’t like it. The owner class loves this shit and hate poor people.

          • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            A landlord cannot just come on top the lawn and start ripping it up without the tenant’s permission.

            On one hand, yes. On the other hand that’s only as enforceable as a tenant can fight it.

            In practice it happens. Unless the tenant has the resources or there’s a legal advocacy group dedicated to that specific issue, owners tend to be able to do whatever they want so long as they use the argument of ‘protecting my property’.

            The settlement and restitution just ends up something like the owner keeps their stuff there and maybe you get to terminate your lease tomorrow without being forced to pay out the whole eight remaining months of the lease. But that’s anecdotal.

            • Sunflier@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              On one hand, yes. On the other hand that’s only as enforceable as a tenant can fight it.

              Trespass to land is a tort, which means there’s the potential for monetary damages.

      • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m assuming the higher ups for one of the more corp stores allows them there. The people actually working the stores hate them.

        • Sunflier@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I guess that kinda depends on the business structure. Are they fully owned and operated by the main corporation? Or are they licensees of the store’s name and brand? If it’s the first one, some humdrum middle manager could do what you said. If it’s the later, those surveillance things could be trespassing.

          • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Each store has to take care of a part of the lot, but this is all secondhand info from employees working in the stores. So I’d assume one of the stores is fine with the yapping tower thing on one of their spots, even if the other stores aren’t.

  • null@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 days ago

    WARNING CITIZEN! THIS AREA IS UNDER SURVEILLANCE! YOUR FACE HAS BEEN SCANNED AND ADDED TO A DATABASE!

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      is this the perfect example where men can finally understand why women chose the bear?

      edit: I’m greatly amused that six cucks disliked this comment.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I like it. “Which do you feel safer around, a cop or a crackhead?” Should upset the wife beaters.