• Staiden@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m absolutely fine with 1.5 million. I enjoy lemmy much more than reddit. I feel like content and conversations here are better. None of the karma farming and corporate promotion disguised as natural content.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Although you’re correct, I find fediverse lacking in the department of the more niche stuff, e.g. fandoms of specific games, communities by geo proximity, obscure hobbies.

        But well, Reddit wasn’t like this from the start and I hope the diversity and smaller communities will be here instead of there with time.

        • triclops6@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          Former r/fountainpens Reddit refugee here, and I agree 1.5m users doesn’t generate the kind of traffic for my hobby to figure in any sort of way. I miss the engagement

      • ericjmorey@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        1.5 million is almost entirely Mastodon users which have no clue how Lemmy’s commenting culture works so rarely contribute in a way that makes sense to both the Mastodon commenter and the Lemmy comenter/poster at the same time.

        Lemmy has ~20k ish actively commenting accounts.

  • zaphod@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I wonder how long it’ll take before we finally collectively reject the SV ethos that size is the only metric that matters and success is only achieved via monopoly…

    There was a time when Usenet and BBBses and IRC was tiny and yet people still found value through community in those places.

    Maybe, and I know this is a wild idea, platforms don’t have to include every human on the planet to be meaningful, relevant, or valuable.

    • whereisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I was an avid Reddit user but dropped it like a stone in the kerfuffle - it took a while but Lemmy has now replaced that 90%

      I’d love to see a content propagation analysis.

      My sense is that a ton of new memes are first shared on Lemmy then shared across to other social media.

      …Ok, so the niche forums don’t have critical mass yet, and you’d have to post to some general thread to get any response - but all the cool and thoughtful people are here, so the level of general discourse is higher, I love it.

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I hear this one loud and clear. I was on the internet in 95, and worked in SV for 20 years, and when I saw the small number for Lemmy in this graphic it made me happy.

  • words_number@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    Seriously, who on earth uses facebook? Lol

    The only website on this graphic that has some actual value (apart from the fediverse of course) is youtube.

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      My wife uses Facebook every day.

      She’s a very family oriented person and she’s gonna be wherever they are.

      She’s the kind of person who wakes up and calls her mom, then her grandma, then her sisters every single day. Hell, she even talks to her nephews every day and they’re toddlers.

      There really isn’t anything that compares as far as that goes.

    • GhostTheToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Didn’t Facebook build infrastructure and give out free phones in India and other developing nations to get them online? I’m sure it was more to harvest their data, but I’m sure that counts pretty solidly for them

      • sfgifz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        They got a service provider to let its users browse Facebook for free, but that was banned a year later for being unfair. It’s still a thing in other developing counties I guess.

    • 𝚝𝚛𝚔@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Seriously, who on earth uses facebook?

      Me? I know it’s the current hotness to not be on there, but I don’t get sites like Instagram / TickTock / Snapchat where its just reacting to photos and images. I want words dammit.

    • shadowbert@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      3 billion of them. So, over a third of the population of earth does (at least according to this graphic).

    • Cyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Me, tbh I don’t like meta but the groups in facebooks is probably what keeps me there, for example there is a group about an anime and the guys there literally translate the new volumes of the novel months faster than other piracy sites, almost in the moment, there is also the memes and other posts that only appear around those groups. Not even reddit has that content, so what keeps me attached to facebook is mainly anime groups

    • lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      yeah, there are quite a number of people who have multiple accounts. almost everyone I know does. same goes for whatsapp and instagram. it’s still a massive number nonetheless

      • Sine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not always

        Lemmy still doesn’t create enough content that I want

        But I try to use lemmy more anyways

        Hopefully more people will use lemmy more

        • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Here too there are misconceptions!

          What’s important are the hard numbers, soft metrics like user count are misleading! Some may look large at first, but hardly grow with higher engagement, while in others engagement greatly increases the size.

          • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            True. Related to that I wish there were more engagement on lemmy. Most of the posts in my stream have zero replies or 1 and it’s the bot. But let’s keep smaller numbers - quality over quantity.

            • Deceptichum@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              We’re not filtering for quality vs quantity at the moment, more people isn’t going to change anything for the worse there.

              • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                True, it’s not at all stage where it’s likely to be a problem. The army of very old persons isn’t at the door just yet ;-)

    • Kokesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes. Quality is the key thing about fediverse. Also - size doesn’t mean everything. Black holes are small, but mighty. Lemmy sucks most of my spare time already.

  • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’d be interested to see how different it would look if we only counted average active daily users

    • lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Facebook would still dominate. it’s over 2 billion. granted others would become even smaller. reddit being one tenth of its size in the picture.

      this graph also excludes weibo and qq.

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    we really need to stop calling it formerly Twitter and just call it Shitter.

    he ruined the platform, the people can ruin a name

  • Luft@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Can we please try to deadname Twitter harder? As a person who had an x in their name, it’s really annoying to have some dickhead copyright it

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      As a person who had an x in their name

      Does that mean you changed your name?