Massachusetts’ law prohibiting the possession and sale of some semiautomatic weapons commonly used in mass shootings is acceptable under a recent change to Second Amendment precedent from the US Supreme Court, a federal judge said Thursday.
  • Ryumast3r@lemmy.world
    111·
    2 years ago

    10th amendment specifies exactly what you’re saying, that nothing explicitly written is up to the people or states.

    • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      66·
      2 years ago

      Well that’s exactly my point. It’s gutting 150 years of precedent making you guys a country.

      It’s not a good thing. A war was fought over this.