• RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Different league from the best muskets from back then. That the ar15 has plenty of contemporary peers is clear

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Well yeah. My point is the AR-15 isn’t anything special these days. To single it out is irresponsible at best. We need to tackle the general issue of semi-auto rifles with external magazines. Everything else is just performative crap.

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Haha… we where talking on different wavelenghts.

          The strategy is most likely to set a precedent with the most common, recognizable and notorious weapon of the bunch. Once the precedent is set, alternatives will follow.

          And i guess there is something to be said for this. The so called “well-regulated militia” from back in the days pales in comparison to a trained 2 man shooter team with modern weapons.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Okay but we’ve been here before. They just tried to add more names. To which the gun industry just changed the names. Then they tried to ban certain features. To which the gun industry just built around them.

            Until we deal with the heart of the weapon and the reason for it’s combat effectiveness we’ll remain in this cycle.