• Makeitstop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    2 is more divisive. It seems like it was fairly well received when it first came out and then popular opinion cooled on it. A lot of people still like it or will at least defend it, but the people who hate it will go into agonizing detail about how bad it is.

    3 is the one that nobody liked very much, but by the time it came out nobody expected much either. It feels closer to a straight to video sequel than a legitimate entry in the franchise. And while it made its budget back, it was by far the least successful movie in the franchise. There’s a reason why this was the last one they made until the soft reboot a decade and a half later.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh… Looks like I’ll continue not have seen 3 then.

      I was starting to reevaluate that.

      • PoopingCough@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I feel like i could write an entire essay on why 3 is the second best in the franchise. For me its JP 1 > 3 > 2 and then none of the World movies are worth the time even if you can watch for free.