

if you don’t participate a lot, or don’t have potentially controversial opinions, it won’t happen as much and won’t be noticeable
if you don’t participate a lot, or don’t have potentially controversial opinions, it won’t happen as much and won’t be noticeable
Sadly, indeed
People paying everything by card won’t be interested anyways, and that’s a LOT of people
I’ve heard that in countries with bad economy there’s still some usage, but nothing incredible
I’ve met people who are in those types of countries and they told me they mainly hold crypto to avoid the enormous inflation of their currency, and pay with it or exchange when they want to spend it. Basically an alternative to exchanging fiat to another fiat
Then you’re basically making a ROM and there are many small detections for this. Many apps rely on proprietary closed source code like google play services
You will be able to do some things, but it will be a massive pain. Android is big, really big. Emulating will just mean you’re running Android all over again (and it’s often detected). Making a fork is a lot of work
Congrats, I wouldn’t and it’s a pain
They definitely prefer to spend their money on development, rather than adding safeguards
I don’t believe people misusing ChatGPT helps them in any way, it’s just that adding protections has a cost
but they aren’t able to tell when a child is at risk and report it as well?
Maybe police actually sorts and filters manually reports, but doesn’t want to bother with mental health things? You know how the USA works, I don’t believe OpenAI will go too far, they’ll just randomly report.
Might even be reported for all I know, sometimes I just like to see the reaction of LLMs when I say I’ll commit horrible stuff like school shootings or terrorism. The NSA will just feed it into their mass spying algorithm to check the most important profiles and this will be it
The war on drugs is so much more important than mental health detection, y’know. It sells more.
You must have used ChatGPT a lot to say this, because that’s completely false. There are safeguards for both things.
If you missuse some things at this point, then it’s not the thing’s fault
Uses a tool the bad way despite it being public knowledge that it’s bad for mental health
Was predisposed to mental health problems
Died, partly because they talked to a chatbot
“It’s the chatbot’s, creator fault”, despite the chatbot never being made to cause those problems, and efforts being made to fix those problems
…
Yea nah, it’s just anti-ai people doing their thing again and not being objective.
Get a better fight, such as hating on pharmaceutical laboratories companies pushing the use of extremely addictive substances for profit, despite them knowing the immense risk they cause to consumers, and financing false ads to make it safe.
If Sam Altman belongs in prison, it would either be:
I mean, I see this as a consequence of all these articles about people using ChatGPT for harmful things
You can, but no one will use it because you won’t have Android apps on it. The lock in is real
oh, I didn’t know this
uh, not sure, I’m in Europe as well
I was thinking about NFC payments, yea
Nice timing for chat control!
Google pay is being shut down?
Seems like Curve pay could be an alternative
it was funny, thanks
Any other format for lossless to recommend?
It’s funny how “someone should murder Trump” would get banned from here, but saying this, which essentially means the same thing, is not
Coming soon: McDonalds get sued for selling burgers to a minor that ate 3 burgers every day and died! McDonalds must set thresholds per customer and collect IDs from minors!
I would be for holding companies responsible when they fuck up, like McDonalds clearly marketing burgers to minors and saying it’s healthy, but we must not hold them more accountable than they really are
Soon: huggingface gets sued because hosted models are being used for getting drug recipes, or did not actively prevent people from killing themselves through it
By the way, I was recently testing https://nano-gpt.com/ which claims to have privacy through TEE models… but I don’t see how it’s private in any way? It just guarantees that the output went through some TEE, but it doesn’t guarantee that the input and output didn’t leak elsewhere or got logged