this has no context

de la cruz

I’d say they are expressing honest opinions that happen to be useful to Russian state interests

the people producing the content that I’ve seen talk about it so far have said there was no editorial line at all, and they individually all had full control of what they produced. the company’s only creative contributions were when it made thumbnails and posted clips

there’s a bunch of people on Lemmy really mad that they can’t tell everyone not to vote for Biden anymore.

is there any evidence for this claim at all?

glenn beck made the single strongest case i’ve heard for kamala this morning: of all the electeds in DC, she was ONE of EIGHTEEN signatories on the green new deal.

i really didn’t think i’d come around on her, but glenn is who sold me on obama too so it makes sense.

they fixed the AV kerning

He’s tainted goods.

he reaches across the aisle. i’m not going to vote forhim (again) for senator but i would vote for aoc for president.

how about AOC Fetterman?

oh god no. someone might take it seriously.

given that it’s obviously a joke, i thought a little razzing was appropriate.

pov: you’ve never heard of kerning

did you ever get them lottery numbers?

i’ve decided to turn around. i’m ridin with biden!

oh: sync.

no, thank you

how do you tag people?

anyone can read this and see

I have presented exactly as much evidence as anyone else.

damn. i have watched that interview a dozen times and missed that it was the head table. what i did hear (and transcribed just now while watching it) was:

“war has failed in the middle east”

“we need a peace offensive”

“there was no interpreter”

“no introductions were made”

“it was a chance to lift up a different point of view about US … as well as Russian foreign policy.”

“I spent the dinner talking to the german diplomat”

“i wasn’t paid a penny.”

“i declined sponsorship”

“nothing happened at that dinner”

“that picture circulates without a single fact”

“i was there with a number of peace advocates”

i’m sure you can understand how i found it forgettable that it was the head table, and i hope you can forgive my assertion that it was not.

really? can you link that? i’ve been arguing about this irrelevant photo for over half a decade and this is the first i’ve heard it was the head table.