I’ll write it one more time: if an instance bans a communist but not the person threatening said person with violence, it’s a Nazi-friendly community

Then this equally applies to lemmy.zip, presumably. But apparently it doesn’t.

That’s up to you, but you’ve made a bunch of assumptions in everything here.

As I said: Also, whether or not you characterise it as a threat (I think it’s unsavoury and emotive and violent rhetoric, but not really a threat as such unless you specifically plan to go to Poland or something) - it doesn’t automatically make them or someone a nazi.

And you’re not answering my question: And can you tell me why you don’t also make these same claims to lemmy.zip since the user is from there?

So anyone who is rude to a communist is automatically a nazi? Is that your genuine position?

And can you tell me why you don’t also make these same claims to lemmy.zip?

I’m pointing out your double standards when judging instances, and your accusation - even if entirely true, doesn’t remotely meet the threshold of being nazi at all.

If the threat of violence from another user directed at me had happened in a .zip instance and I had gotten banned instead of them, I’d be making the same accusation.

So you don’t apparently expect lemmy.zip to respond to users like that, but you do in piefed.social? What? Because the lemmy.zip user did it on a remote community? Also, how do you know the instance ban and community ban are directly connected?

Also, whether or not you characterise it as a threat (I think it’s unsavoury and emotive and violent rhetoric, but not really a threat as such unless you specifically plan to go to Poland or something) - it doesn’t automatically make them or someone a nazi.

Sorry, do you hold the same accusations to lemmy.zip too, as the user is from that instance? Are they also not nazis by your logic?

Also, are you saying anyone who looks past any threat, or inciendary language or violent rhetoric of any kind to someone who is a communist, no matter the specific context is automatically a nazi?

Banned from that specific community, or banned from the instance entirely? Because being banned from the instance, which did happen, was not for that reason.

I reject your premise of racism. Conspiracy theorism isn’t inherently nazi even if an accurate descriptor of someone in some context.

Rimu is no different to most people on the Threadiverse, or the culture or administration of most instances across the fediverse. If he is “deeply reactionary” then that would make most people and instances on the threadiverse “deeply reactionary” - by your terms of reference. In any case, he’s nowhere near being far-right or a nazi. That’s genuinely just a hateful lie. You won’t convince me out of this. This is a truly nasty accusation and speaks to your incredibly low character.

I don’t understand what context you’re supposedly referring to here that somehow justfies hurling outright baseless lies against people.

No, it’s not. I see we’ve degraded from “nazi” to “far-right” to “right-wing” in a few posts too. And if Rimu is right wing, then almost everyone on the fediverse is right-wing according to you - not just piefed, or piefed.social. And sure, I understand that you can interpret nazism in a wider context - but even if you do, Rimu is nowhere near that.

It seems to me to be self-evident that it just isn’t nazi to claim the holodomor was a genocide. You may think it’s wrong, incorrect, perhaps suggestive of unjustified prejudice against communism - but it just isn’t nazi. It’s a nasty vile smear to throw at people. No context makes it so (not even remotely sure what you’re referring to in this case). Rimu is not anti-semitic, Rimu is not a white supremacist, Rimu does not support a one-party authoritarian dictatorship.

And even if it was: If you’re going to accuse Piefed of being specifically far-right or nazi on this basis, then you have to also throw that at most other instances - which the other user didn’t do here.

You think believing the Holodomor is a genocide is inherently far-right? I don’t think either of them are inherently far-right (especially not the former). Also, by “users” you specifically mean Rimu here. Would others hold the same opinion? Sure. But they also do so across the Threadiverse - not specifically on piefed, or piefed.social in specific. If you’re going to accuse Piefed of being specifically far-right on this basis, then you have to also throw that at most other instance - which they didn’t do.

These are not Nazi viewpoints. Moreover, he doesn’t “promote” them other than anyone else promoting what they say as specific users. You think anyone who believes the Holodomor was genocide is a nazi? That’s your definition?

So if I held a similar position on the Holodomor, that would make me a nazi according to you?

Nazi instances nuke Tankie viewpoints because they’re nazis (see feddit and piefed)

Can you tell me what nazi viewpoints are promoted on Piefed please? Be specific.

This particular post has identified a bug specifically. Nothing in the code you keep references the community search tools to begin with.

The OP linked to the function with the ‘enoughmuskspam’ filter in it: it’s here (line 352 if it doesn’t auto-scroll down).

It’s a bug with the latest update that has already been patched. Not sure if piefed.ca has updated their instance in response to it, but this isn’t even completely right as lemmy.ca was still returning results for “piracy” in the search.

“So since a few hours ago, when I deployed v1.6, many communities no longer show up in the search. the private value should be true or false but really old communities have it as null”

“Yes, null should be fixed to true or false. I originally added the private column many months ago, with no default value. So now the data is all over the place.”

(excerpts from the matrix chat)

OP made some assumptions, got excited and just found a bug.

It’s not disturbing. OP has unwittingly found a bug that they were passing off as a gotcha.

This was (is) my original lemmy.world account.