Harvard’s Joint Center for Housing Studies disagrees: https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/blog/defining-the-generations-redux

That being said, the birth years from 1978-1984 seem to comprise a fuzzy cohort with an even more unique shared experience; some have dubbed this “generation Catalano,” “the Oregon Trail generation,” or even “Xennnials.” We each may personally find our experiences here closer to Gen X or Y, but this millennial cusp coinciding with the advent of the Internet has certainly yielded something interesting.

Then what’s the point of a cutoff?

Honestly, anything before 1985 doesn’t feel millennialish.

That’s pure speculation. Did you even read the article?

Edit: here, let me help you:

Also, Microsoft has yet to share if the feature will be enabled by default or can be toggled on and off by meeting organizers or admins.

No, the title is quite accurate. There is no magic to discern “sensitive” data from that which is not.

And you aren’t a millennial.

We’ve had one bird flu, yes, but what about second bird flu?

Does it really count if they were babies?

I’m not sure if you’re completely up-to-date on this whole encoding thing.

You are in awe of how disappointed you are?

Unless it’s ISO 8859-1, apparently.

You misspelled UTF-8

Backslashes are not extended ASCII

Are you in awe of how stupid they are?

Why?

Yes

Yes

For now

Thought crime is thought crime.

My employer’s CI rejects extended ASCII characters :(

Typically, “sex” is used in reference to biological characteristics, and “gender” to sociological ones.