green_red_black

Five bucks it’s just progressive PAC money and Small dollar donations as far as political contributions are concerned (which surprise Donald is totally legal or are you advocating that we get money out of politics and have a campaign system that is publicly run and financed.)

If so I will admit being mistaken here.

Still though I honestly don’t feel worried about a Pro-ICE candidate winning the Minnesota governorship (possibly across the board but I don’t have that deep of a knowledge.)

Yeah unless his interest is to literally get rid of ICE then him being the candidate and winning would not be a threat for ICE.

Let’s be honest he is only criticizing because the negative optics, not out of genuine moral reasoning

Erm unless both GOP candidates are in the general election they wouldn’t be splitting votes

At the same time though ICE is not looking welcomed in the state so I honestly wouldn’t be surprised that the pro-Ice candidate finds even the state’s party voters not voting for them.

The bunker was originally the West Wing. But that is being made into a temple for the Orange Demon so a new bunker is needed (until a second temple is decided that is)

Is there any other?

Fort Knox is a literal fortress

The Communist China State will use it for the Same reasons the US State and Corporations use the data of us

If privacy was your concern then join Loop. That one is Fediverse certified

Yeah five bucks says if your watch history is exclusively LGBT related content that’s going to tip people off

So we the Fediverse made an alternative because it seemed Tik Tok would be gone now we are going to find ourselves pushing the same alternative because Tik Tok is a privacy nightmare (I mean it already was but this seems worse.)

As in all of these cities have work places on strike or said they will?

Indeed but at the same time the DOJ needs to show that the source was indeed not the raid.

“The origin is the department records office.”

“How did it get in the records office.”

“We stored it after a different raid that was found illegal.”

And even mask off it’s still “works for the small number of people.”

The masks are off but the system is still the system

Because they would have to. Any lie or failure to establish where they got the data makes it inadmissible evidence.

Yes this parallel construction was brought up but given how rather public this story is it’s going to raise brows and be asked about its origins

I figured that because that’s literally how evidence works.

For the evidence to be viable the chain of who had it and where is needed.

One of the first questions to be brought up is where did this evidence first originate.

And if the data was accessed via the phone the courts already said no you can’t access than that makes the data inadmissible and in all likelihood has the defense walking free.

As for finding different evidence elsewhere you are correct and that’s is what will have to happen, something the Trump DOJ would hate because to them they already had what they needed.

Or she could plea Democrat Witch Hunt

And funny enough it’s a conservative supreme court who align with Reagan created that BS “historical tradition.” Rule has resulted in those laws being called unconstitutional

Yeah if the data was from a source that the courts considered legal then it would then be viable

Given who is in power now the whole “it gives you the constitutional right to a fire arm.” Might want to be reconsidered.

(To be clear not saying Charlie Kirk’s “mass shootings is an acceptable thing to keep our guns.” Logic is still absolutely BS. It’s just with the State on the Federal level and in every Republican controlled state turning to Facisim at a rapid pace a community defense that is armed is looking rather valuable to have.)