Well, that’s true, but the hormones of a 15 year old impair their wisdom. Unless there is significant cognitive deterioration a 70 year old would have no problem with that.

And, I’d bet on average the 70 year old has more weslth, breadth and length of experience. Pulling it 100% out of my ass though, no data to back it up.

Smarter maybe, but wiser?

So, the one women supposedly pick? Got it.

I’m neither feigning ignorance, asking for evidence nor anything associated with sea lioning. So maybe go read a book. I’m saying I’m absolutely tired of an entire group of people playing victims while another entire group of people gets demonized. Easier to understand? I’m saying it’s not normal for a woman to feel afraid just because a man is nearby.

But the baseless sea lioning argument you read somewhere else on lemmy and don’t understand is essier, I get it.

I get that, and it may come across as aggressive, true. That was not the intent. I’m not saying they are lying, I’m trying to say they should stop focusing only on “this group is the victim”, “this group is the predator”, which is the vibe that most people here give. And the other examples (which are pretty common everyday, not extreme, I think, though I did point one extreme case that people know.

Also, it’s pretty tyring trying to write anything here on lemmy since every time you say something someone disagrees with you are “sea lioning”, “you are a troll” or “you are the bear”. (not you, check the other comments). Nobody goes tell them “You should remain calm and have civil conversation”, though.

Yeah, it has to do with feeling fear of being the victim of a crime. Pull yours out your ass. It isn’t any less traumatic.

Sure, if course, the goal is the make it safer for everyone. One if the ways to make it a safer and better place is to stop inducing females with the unbased fear that just by existing and being nearby a man they are going to be raped, killed or worse. Because it does not happen, and then it devolves into fucking sexism. And it’s not okay. Most men here will have never have raped, sexually assaulted nor been anything remotely violent towards women. Yet media/sociaty acts as if they all are! WTF how is that cool? Isn’t that the same as racism, ageism and other isms? Judging/presenting someone by the negative traits of few of their population?

Plus legally in most countries a woman can get you drunk and or drugged and have sex with you against your will or consent and it’s legally okay, but the opposite is not true. You can be a male musician, like say, Justin Bieber or the guy playing guitar on the metro and be CONSTANTLY interrupted and harassed by women and noone bats an eye. Hell, I said male a couple times, if I said female referring to a woman everyone would lose their shit!

First step to make thinks safer/better for everyone is stop fear mongering and demonizing one group, that’s what I’m saying.

Thing is, statistically speaking, you, as a male, have way more chances of dying, getting assaulted, getting robbed, and in general pretty much every kind of crime that is not sexual assault. So you have way more chances of running across a traumatic psycho, yet you do not see every male holding the drink like that.

Yeah, for real, “Someone will 100%, do you want it to be your friends/family/people you know or some absolute random stranger?” Some lemmitors would surely answer “My people, for sure”

Well, supposedly they got both inspired by The Lottery, which is a book that predates Battle Royale as well.

Ok, you just downvote and say no, but no explanation given. In my gov several cases of corruption arised during the last couple of years, and way more in the past. They affect high ranking ministers, and yet the oresident does not resign. Same with companies, they get paid the most, do the least, claim it is vecause they have “lots of responsabilities” but still never pay the price

Nah, it’s a bit like government. Its only his responsability if it is no one elses responsability. Like, they can have the most corrupt gabinets, most presidents do not resign/abdicate, whatever the word is.

Poe’s law, random stranger, poe’s law, but take my upvote

Then why the quotation marks?

Imbecile.

Sure, sure, was not desagreeing, technically you are using ChatGPT. Just pointing out that the model itself handling the image creation is not chatgpt

Think is, it’s either under 2h of play or 2 weeks on your account. So, if you buy the game cause “it’s super cheap, an amazing oportunitt” and don’t plan to play until say, next month… then you are effed. I guess in this case, since it is fraudulent/criminal, steam would do something, but that’s how they planned on exploiting the return policy.

Yeah, but the model that does the images is actually Dall-e, you are just using gpt’s interface to create them

Machine learning IS AI. Seriously guys, you can hate it as much as you want (and calling LLMs autocomplete is quite reductive), but Machine learning is a subfield of AI.

I see this opinion parroted a lot around here, word by word, so I guess is the new popular opinion, but still… it is a fact that it’s AI.

That said, bit moronic to try an use them for military decision making, sure, at least nowadays.

Your opinion, not a fact. Most art is as derivative or more than AI art.