When I click the link in the seedit repo, on the webpage it says “fetching ipns from ipfsgateway.xyz”

There’s really only one way to make sure no new ones come to be…

I’ve read about the lightning reversal before I knew he would use it, so I know what to try. The one time I had the opportunity, I timed it completely wrong, jumped too early and was on the ground again by the time it struck.

I’m at the top of ashina castle. Spent a good couple of hours on that boss, was super happy to get past it. Then he threw off his clothes and got all lightningy. Haven’t managed to get back to that phase yet.

Yep, first time. It feels so good when it clicks!

Sekiro is really testing my patience with my own skills

Plenty of society’s after the 1600s, that had people and rulers who disagreed with that notion.

Yep, I really hope a future will become reality where Adobe has some competition and/or an incentive to port the suite to Linux. I just can’t help but cheer on the sounds against Stockholm syndrome. So much of these “it doesn’t work on Linux” is just the company intentionally trying to prohibit integration with open systems (looking at you HDMI forum). In the end I agree, though, when giving advice, it’s best not to assume the “only gaming” use case.

From my experience it’s still a common misconception and I think it’s the largest potential group that can switch. Sucks that your usecase is unsupported, though. Just out of interest, what software can you still not run?

It’s been a while since I’ve watched it myself, but remember them going into the ownership structure.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNZy603as5w

There’s basically no way for them to not make it a subscription model.

This is a pretty interesting counter example: https://www.eteknix.com/running-yuzu-on-switch-gives-you-better-performance-than-native-gaming/

But, as others have said, exceptions confirm the rule.

You might share a split brain with me. I had this exact thought, but decided to leave it out of my comment.

Can recommend the video from cgpgrey on it to anyone: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfYbgdo8e-8

I wonder if internally the emoji’s are added through a different mechanism that doesn’t pick up the original request. E.g. another LLM thread that has the instruction “Is this apologetic? If it is, answer with exactly one emoji.” After this emoji has been forcefully added, the LLM thread that got the original request is trying to reason why the emoji would be there, resulting in more apologies and trolling behaviour.

If what the first commenter said is true. They will just implement RCS or an alternative in the EU and make up some reason why they can’t or won’t for the US market.