Kevin Monahan, 65, shot 20-year-old Kaylin Gillis after a car she was riding in with friends made a wrong turn on his property

A man was convicted of second-degree murder Tuesday for fatally shooting a young woman when the SUV she was riding in mistakenly drove up his rural driveway in upstate New York.

A jury found Kevin Monahan, 66, guilty of second-degree murder for shooting 20-year-old Kaylin Gillis on a Saturday night last April after she and her friends pulled into his long, curving driveway near the Vermont border while they were trying to find another house.

The group’s caravan of two cars and a motorcycle began leaving once they realized their mistake. Authorities said Monahan came out to his porch and fired twice from his shotgun, with the second shot hitting Gillis in the neck as she sat in the front passenger seat of an SUV driven by her boyfriend.

  • voracitude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    2 years ago

    Good. What kind of a fucking psychopath sees a car of lost young people and decides, instead of offering directions or at worst leaving them the fuck alone, that they deserve assault with a deadly weapon?

    Goddamn deranged.

            • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              taxation without representation

              That’s a Declaration of Independence item, not US Constitution.

              It was in reference to Britain passing the Stamp Act (and other things) charging fees on people living in what is today the United States to prop up the treasury of Britain.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              “No taxation without representation” is just a catchy slogan, not a legal principle. It has the same legal standing as “if the glove don’t fit you must acquit.”

    • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      Someone who has been conditioned by decades of fear propaganda, and taught that his guns are the only thing standing between him and the government/immigrants/criminals/whatever the fear of the day is

      • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        An old, sweet lady was once talking to my wife about the blackout curtains in our bedroom. She says she bought some like it so “antifa couldn’t see inside” her house.

        It makes me so angry that Fox News convinced her to be scared of a boogyman.

      • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I think we need to be mindful that we can’t point at one media organization or “political aisle” for this type of rhetoric. @Microw@lemm.ee above encapsulates it beautifully.

        Some areas simply have no-good groups of people like neonazis that will go into houses and try to take them over

        The fear mongering isn’t subject to particular ideologies and anyone is susceptible. These tactics are being used by nearly(edit) everyone in the political realm.

        edit: just gotta say I love the downvotes with no replies. There is a middle-ground nuanced objectivity where neither “both parties are the same” or “my political side is holier than thou” apply. Go touch some grass or learn how to have an actual conversation with those you disagree with online.

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh it’s worse than that, they were already leaving when he came out and shot them.

      oh and this bullshit excuse:

      He said he tripped over nails sticking up from the deck, lost his balance and the shotgun struck the deck. That, he said, accidentally caused his gun to fire at the Ford Explorer carrying Gillis.

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        The first shot was an accident. Obviously the second shot was to prove to them that the first one was an accident cuz if he were trying to shoot them, then he’d just shoot them. He probably tried shouting those words, but realized they were too far so he just had to show them what a great shot he was when he was trying by actually shooting one of them.

        Totally innocent miscommunication.

    • Rooskie91@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is the nature of widespread gun ownership. Owning a gun turns every argument, every perceived wrong, every bruised ego into a potentially deadly situation. Buying a gun, “for protection,” is the dumbest fucking statement I’ve ever heard. Increasing the number of guns laying around ALWAYS creates a more dangerous environment.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The only thing about this I can somewhat understand is that it wasnt one car, it was two cars and a motorcycle. I would probably be a bit scared if such a big group of people suddenly show up to my rural house.

      But 1. shooting them, and 2. while they were already driving away, is what makes this so deranged.