Judge Lewis Kaplan purposefully did not disclose why he advised jurors to keep their identities secret in the high profile case

After the verdict was read in the defamation trial between writer E Jean Carroll and former president Donald Trump, the judge overseeing the trial suggested the jurors never reveal their identities.

At the end of the two-week trial, the jurors, who were purposefully made anonymous due to the high-profile nature of the case, are now free to identify themselves by name if they wish.

“My advice to you is that you never disclose that you were on this jury,” Judge Lewis Kaplan advised them in the courtroom.

Judge Kaplan did not explicitly explain why he was offering the advice, however, previous legal actions against the ex-president have led to threats of violence against both jurors and judges from Trump supporters.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    “I fully disagree with both verdicts and will be appealing this whole Biden Directed Witch Hunt focused on me and the Republican Party. Our Legal System is out of control, and being used as a Political Weapon. They have taken away all First Amendment Rights. THIS IS NOT AMERICA!” [Trump] claimed…

    This mother fucker is so dumb he thinks civil suits are brought about by the federal government. Sometimes I still can’t believe this guy was actually president.

    • nyctre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      That’s for his followers, to rile them up and keep them loyal, that’s not really what he believes. Not to say he isn’t a dumb cunt, he is, but this is not an example of that.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I swear in a hundred years there will be arguments in every history class about whether his entire political career was even real or some kind of parable to frighten young people into voting.

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Didn’t disclose why?

    It’s because MAGA are murderous cowards. That’s why.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        My eyes drifted to the next reply before properly finishing your sentence and I read “And Trump is a dick-eater.”

        Now, homophonic attacks aren’t good or encouraged, but it was such an unexpected bitter non sequitur that I had to chuckle.

    • Steve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Murderous assholes sure, but coward? Not sure what you’re referring to with that one.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Remember when Ashli Babbitt the terrorist got shot for trying to reach Congressional representatives? What did all the other little cowards do but immediately gasp and stop their little game once they were hit by reality served by lead.

  • dankm@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m honestly shocked that American juries aren’t anonymous by default.

  • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    These are the kinds of instructions given for jurors of mafia and cartel trials. Which is perfectly fitting. Hope the jurors stay safe.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    At the end of the two-week trial, the jurors, who were purposefully made anonymous due to the high-profile nature of the case, are now free to identify themselves by name if they wish.

    After approximately three hours of deliberations, the jury ordered Mr Trump to pay $83.3m in damages to Ms Carroll after he repeatedly rejected her claim that he sexually assaulted her in a department store dressing room in the mid-1990s.

    The trial comes after a similar one last year where a jury found Mr Trump liable for sexually abusing Ms Carroll and defaming her.

    “I fully disagree with both verdicts and will be appealing this whole Biden Directed Witch Hunt focused on me and the Republican Party.

    THIS IS NOT AMERICA!” he claimed, despite there being no evidence that President Joe Biden has directed the Department of Justice to target Mr Trump.

    The trial lasted two weeks in a Manhattan federal court, during which Mr Trump’s attorneys aggressively litigated the case while the former president went after Ms Carroll during press conferences and on Truth Social, potentially defaming her further.


    The original article contains 432 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 58%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Judge Lewis Kaplan purposefully did not disclose why he advised jurors to keep their identities secret in the high profile case

    Isn’t that pretty freaking self evident? “If they find out who you are… you’re dead. Don’t let them find out. We will help you.”

  • DBT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    His cult is a threat here so much so that the judge told them not to tell anyone they were involved.

    Everyone knows this is a legit warning even though trump didn’t tell anyone to do anything here.

    Imagine if trump actually told his supporters (cult) to take action. Something like, “go down to the capitol and fight like hell”! …. Oh wait…

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Pretty low. Most of those people respect the court regardless of any political affiliation.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If you’re asking why Trump wasn’t charged with sexual assault, it’s because the statute of limitations had run out. She was able to prove to a jury in civil court that there was a preponderance of evidence that he sexually assaulted her. His deposition was played for the jury but he did not attend the trial. In the deposition, he denied ever meeting the victim and called her crazy. She testified for two days, had corroborating witnesses, and photos of her with Trump proving they had met. Trump was shown the photo in his deposition and confused the victim for his wife at the time, Marla Maples.

      Two additional victims testified that he assaulted them in the same way, and they had the audio of the tape where Trump says he can grab women by the pussy.

      So Trump’s statements

      • He didn’t know her, never met her
      • He wouldn’t assault her because she’s ugly
      • He didn’t assault her, that’s a lie she made up

      Her evidence

      • Photo of them together
      • He thought she looked like his wife
      • Pattern of assault and private admissions that he assaults women

      It feels icky disproving that second one, but it just demonstrates that every statement is a proven lie.

      Would that be enough to convict him of sexual assault in New York? We won’t know that for sure, but we do know that Trump sexually assaults women.