• mindlight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a non US citizen this is just a Robin Williams in Jumanji moment…

    WHAT YEAR IS IT?!?!

    Anyways, welcome to the year of the interwebs.

    Have you got rid of your cheques and faxes yet? 😉

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      my wife is disputing a Healthcare charge. Went to a specialist 13 times, they reimbursed us 9 times but not the other 4, at a cost of about $800.

      we have to communicate with the appeals center by fax, and wait for their snail mail response.

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh we can file our taxes online, we’re just required to pay massive amounts of money to a corporate middleman to do it.

      • webadict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh we can ___, we’re just required to pay massive amounts of money to a corporate middleman to do it.

        Basically America.

    • jeremyparker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m in the USA and we’ve been able to file our federal taxes for free online for like a decade, I’m not sure what these people are talking about. What’s new here is that this is the IRS’s official tool.

      Previously we had to use an outside service – but it was – and still is – free for normal people/people with normal taxes (eg I have 3 kids and a mortgage and I use it every year). State taxes are another story – that’s usually about $20. And that probably hasn’t changed; state taxes have nothing to do with our IRS.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except for the last several years it’s becoming harder to file for free. TurboTax’s free service developed some worse and worse dark patterns every year, where it was very easy to click the wrong thing and end up being charged. Iirc the fact that they provided a free service at all was to keep control of the market and prevent the IRS from stepping in with a service like this. ProPublica did some good investigations on this.

    • theatomictruth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still write 2 cheques a year because my water bill can only be paid via physical mail (or in person I guess), I’m pretty sure fax is still common in our medical industry.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Faxes… No, no we have not gotten rid of them. On the other hand, that means shenanigans are still available!

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay, I said we’ve not gotten rid of them? But the good news is you can do shenanigans like fax Dad Jokes to random fax numbers…

  • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Due to lack of public identity infrastructure, filing taxes online in Britain takes a long time. I mean, at least 10 minutes 😄

  • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just a heads up it’s only available for the following states:

    Arizona California Florida Massachusetts Nevada New Hampshire New York South Dakota Tennessee Texas Washington state Wyoming

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which is funny considering this is only for federal and not state taxes. Do they say why it’s limited to specific states?

      • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most of the listed states do not have state level income taxes. The only exceptions are Arizona and California. The rest of the states have no state level income tax. Alaska is the only state without a state level income tax that isn’t included in this IRS scheme.

        I imagine there is a reason all but two of the chosen states lack a state level income tax.

        • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          State taxes are probably an additional complication in the calculations that hasn’t been implemented yet for all states. And for those without a state income tax not covered, probably some other state-tax-adjacent thing

      • evatronic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a trial program, to work out the major kinks, issues, and problems before rolling it out further to other states.

        It’s also federal-only, meaning you still have to do your state returns. Most of the states in the trial have no state income tax, which makes it an ideal solution for taxpayers in those states.

        Expect it to expand to all 50 states in the coming years, presuming Republicans don’t somehow manage to legislate it into oblivion like usual.

  • sndrtj@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why did this take the IRS so long where other nations have been doing this for decades?

    • Azal@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Turbotax, H&R Block, and the other tax companies are massively wealthy companies that actively lobby to push laws to keep them from being simple. There are states that they have managed to bar the same thing from happening in.

      • Conyak@lemmy.tf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        To clarify, TurboTax isn’t the company, it is Intuit. They are pretty shitty when it comes to lobbying congress on this.

        • ExfilBravo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are also the de-facto place for large companies that need automated payroll. So some people (like me) get paid by the same crooks.

          • Conyak@lemmy.tf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They are actually not the de facto for large company when it comes to payroll. I think the majority of their customers at company’s with less than 10 employees. I use to work for Intuit on the Quickbooks payroll product. I left about two years ago but I don’t think it’s changed that much.

    • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The other guy linked the answer, but I’m going to explain it anyway:

      In the US, companies have the freedom to bribe lobby our congress members by giving them money that’s totally unrelated to their vote you guys. The reasoning behind that being ok is that the congress official in question is still technically free to vote however they choose despite the money given to them. The reason lobbying works is the threat that the congress person might not get that money next time if they vote against that company’s interests.

      Just so you all know, because our congress members make a government salary of about 150k-250k/year, it’s surprisingly cheap (from a rich company perspective) to lobby them, with lots of payments being in the low thousands. So for obscenely wealthy companies (like intuit), it’s much cheaper to pay just enough guys off to kill a movement than for them to suffer the actual consequences of that movement.

      In this case, intuit’s entire business model depends on American taxes seeming like this mysterious and unapproachable thing that Americans have to pay a third party for in order to not get thrown in jail by the IRS. And given that intuit (and companies like H&R block) rake in billions each year, it’s comparatively pennies to pay off congress officials to keep it that way.

      -> 'Merica

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same reason why our Healthcare system is fucked, it being fucked helps the Insurance Companies make money.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No Login dot gov

      No support in most states

      No ACA filers

      No app payments

      Lots of reason to be frustrated. BUT! This is an absolutely delicious blow to the Intuit lobbyists and if it can handle the simplest of the simple, think of the green light they’ll have towards eventual global parity!

      Been so bad (and evil) for so long, I’m in the mood to celebrate more than nitpick. (No Login dot gov I will say is the funniest thing not to be considered MVP - understandable but funny.)

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean I still login to the VA with DOD credentials or ID.me. They just recently created a VA account specific login. Login.gov is a great idea that won’t get any traction because our government’s departments are mostly siloed. They quite often just don’t even know something is available.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you aren’t able to use this new system, a good second option is freetaxusa.com. Free for most filings and dirt cheap for more complex stuff. Also, they are easier to use than TurboTax.

    • Emerald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would probably have better adoption if it didn’t have such a scammy-sounding name.

      • kirklennon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Intuit divested the tax product in that sale, which was bought by Block (FKA Square) and is part of their Cash App brand. So it’s still around and still not Intuit.

    • nadiaraven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      A better idea is to go to irs.gov and use their free file wizard to see which service is free for you. I used 1040.com this year. Last year I used freetaxusa.com, but this year that would not have been free for me due to my change in income. Which service is free depends on your state, income, and income complexity.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My problem with IRS.gov is they have a history of sending traffic to sites owned by Intuit. These sites would claim to be free, but would then trick the user into a paid pathway and guide them to an expensive paid checkout. I haven’t been back to IRS.gov since experiencing that.

        I learned later that Intuit (who owns Turbotax) had spent millions lobbying to get that to happen. Since the IRS can be lobbied by corporations to do things like that, I just don’t trust IRS.gov to be honest.

    • CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      that’s who I use! $15 to file state, free federal; I mean that’s pretty close to ‘free’ compared to Turbo/Inuit pushing you close to $100 after all the BS. And freetaxusa keeps my info for subsequent years, etc.

      • MindlessZ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is the first launch of the program and they’re still in a pilot phase. It will presumably roll out to more states (maybe all?) Next year

        • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          According to their website it could roll out to more states as soon as mid March of this year.

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thanks Brandon

    Honestly I’ll hope reservations and congratulations till after we see how it goes, but the fact it’s a limited pilot makes me optimistic.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      the fact it’s a limited pilot makes me optimistic

      :-/

      I’ve seen far too many good ideas go through a “limited pilot” program, outperform their intended targets, piss off someone in the DC corporate circuit, and get their budgets vaporized by the next Congress.

  • laverabe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m 100% for a simple IRS tax return but what the heck is with this?

    To use Direct File, you need an IRS account with ID.me.

    To get an ID.me account, you need to:

    Take a video of your face

    If you can’t or don’t want to take a video of your face, you can have a video call with an ID.me agent who will confirm that your face matches your identification.

    Is that really necessary???

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the UK, we typically have to do two forms of identification - usually a passport and a driving licence.

      I imagine that for many Americans, they don’t have a government issued id, whereas basically every Brit will have a driver’s licence for id so they can go out drinking.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the same as going to a bank and letting the teller look at your face. It’s to prevent someone from stealing your identity using a picture of your ID.

      How can they verify the ID is real without physically seeing it? They look up the info but still need to verify that you are the person on the ID.

      • EssentialCoffee@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        How have they been verifying mailed in tax forms with no pictures for decades?

        Seems like it unnecessarily disenfranchises the poor and the elderly. You have to have access to equipment that can record you and the tech savvy to be able to use it.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok but how come H&R Block doesn’t need to do this? I just give them my IRS PIN and the AGI from last year’s return. The picture shit feels like a poison pill

    • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Stupid fraud prevention ugh!

      Listen folks, if you have a driver license, they already have your face, so settle down.

      • Sl00k@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t mind this being done through the government site, but it shouldn’t be done by a third party business.

  • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    why is it the US is hellbent on making everything a state by state issue but at the same time saying federal law is above state law in such cases like Texas but states with legal cannabis or states with legal abortion are allowed to be above federal

    is the US the United States or not

    make it make sense

    • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The things that the federal government is responsible for are laid out in the Constitution, everything the Constitution does not place into the responsibilities of the federal government is left to state or local authorities.

      Tenth Amendment:

      Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      make it make sense

      We’re a slightly tighter coupled EU with less history of separation. We’re states that are united. Not one big ol unified country.

    • Melllvar@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The idea of checks and balances on the exercise of government powers extends to even the state/federal relationship.

  • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is great for citizens!

    I’m not sure they get bragging rights about a smooth site launch for a tax preparation application when most people don’t even have their W2s yet…

    We’ll see whether this is another healthcare.gov when people actually try to use it, but this is a huge win for people who qualify.

    • TinklesMcPoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Today is the last day a company has to file and send w2’s so most folks should actually have them by now or very very soon.