Donald Trump does not like to lose, as his announcement that he is seeing(sic) new attorneys to appeal the $83 million defamation judgment proves.

  • ElcaineVolta@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    He also called the judge a “bully” and implied that imposing rules, including evidentiary regulations and courtroom behavior, on Trump and his attorneys was evidence of bias.

    a bully? amazing how this fascist strongman can be such an absolute bitch all the time too.

      • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        Conservatives are the biggest snowflakes, afraid of everything. They are like those little yappy dogs that bark at everything

    • flipht@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The whole gag to fascism is that it is 100% projection at all times, both internally and externally.

      They attack people because they’re afraid to get attacked and they can’t imagine a situation where everyone isn’t thinking exactly like them, so of course it’s only a matter of time before they’re attacked…and thus must attack.

      It’s circular and deeply uncreative, but it is the root of every bully, from the playground to the autocratic despot.

          • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Your post history is full of you trying to convince people that there aren’t any modern fascists.

            And I’ll proudly wear the “weirdo” badge for pointing it out.

              • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                We all know why you have a very directed interest in normalizing fascist rhetoric.

                It’d be like if I got incredibly mad every time someone called a stranger a goat fucker for fucking goats.

                You’re telling on yourself.

                • Night Monkey@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  I just love making you people upset. It’s hilarious. It’s like people who believe in bigfoot. When you tell them bigfoot doesn’t exist, they get upset and try to convince you that he’s real when in reality, he doesn’t.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I thought we de-federated sh.itjust.works. That server is a fucking cesspool of conservatism and should be excluded from normal communities.

  • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.deBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    Expect her to complain about pay in two weeks. Trump will hire a"better lawyer" and the appeal will go wonderfully. He will tank it just like all of his cases. In the past he would get away with stuff but do to the publicity he is finally getting punished.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    Donald Trump does not like to lose

    You’d think he’d be used to it by now.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    I was assured multiple times on Lemmy that Habba wasn’t stupid and that she was doing Trump’s bidding in a crafty way.

    Apparently she’s just stupid.

      • Tujio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I mean, you’re guaranteed to end up with a bad rep. Decent chance you’ll end up with a bad RAP.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I was assured multiple times on Lemmy that Habba wasn’t stupid and that she was doing Trump’s bidding in a crafty way.

      Apparently she’s just stupid.

      I’m assuming every other lawyer at this point declines on ethical grounds or those that don’t have any scruples say “You have a history of not paying lawyers so I’ll need cash up front to represent you” and Trump keeps on looking. Removing those groups and you get Habba as your lawyer.

      • reddwarf@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I recently heard another one that gave me a chuckle:

        What do you call the lowest of the lowest performing graduate at law school? A lawyer…

        Same goes for this one, and quite possibly scarier:
        What do you call the lowest of the lowest performing graduate at medical school? A doctor…

    • NegativeNull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I wonder if she’ll be smart enough to sue Trump for her legal fees. I doubt she remembered to ask for payment up front.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      She was still doing his bidding. He bidding was just also stupid, and his narcissism would not let him see that

    • jak@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I still don’t think she’s dumb. I think she’s trying to get and stay famous and she’s doing a pretty good job so far. She’s not a good attorney, but that doesn’t make her dumb.

        • jak@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Do you not see how she’s getting press time for these stunts? I think that’s her goal, so she’s doing pretty well

            • jak@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              I don’t think trump’s goal is fame, so no. I do think Kim kardashian is smart for the same reason though. I’m not saying they’re role models, to be clear.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                I don’t think trump’s goal is fame, so no.

                Are you fucking kidding me? He was a reality TV star for years. He used to insist he had to be in any movie shot in his properties. He brags about his crowd sizes all the time. He recently said privately he was more popular than Taylor Swift.

                What the hell do you think his goal is?

                • jak@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  That’s a fair point, but I do still get the vibe that he cares more about money than fame. It just seems like he really wanted to run for president, and was disappointed when he won. He seemed to hate the last seven years and now it seems he’s just trying to stay out of jail and not have to pay a whole bunch of money, so he thinks being president again is the only way to do that.

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Maybe Giuliani is free?

    In both that he’s not busy and will work for exposure.

    Legal exposure, of course.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    He doesn’t seem to understand that he’s on a race to the bottom for lawyers.

    The ones who could (potentially) win the case, will never take it. The ones who will take the case have no hope of winning it.

  • ShadowRam@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    LOL did they dial up the orange on that photo?

    Because I didn’t think he could go anymore Oompa Loompa, but damn.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      (sic) is the abbreviation for the Latin phrase “sic erat scriptum” or “thus was it written”.

      It’s used when quoting someone who made an error and you are quoting them verbatim. It’s to let you’re audience know that YOU know better, but the quoted source does not.

      Example:

      “It’s to let you’re (sic) audience know that YOU know better.”

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      IDK what it stands for, but it’s used where theres a mistake in a quote. It’s the journalist saying “yes I know that’s wrong but that’s what the person reallg wrote”.

      I’ve heard that if you’re nice to a journalist they’ll tidy up minor issues like that, but if they don’t like you they’ll leave it incorrect and give you a [sic]

  • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    For someone who famously is too scared to fire anyone in person, I wonder how true this is. It’s far more likely that Habbas is no longer under the illusion that there’s a paycheck waiting for her and it’s being spun as “fired/dumped” for the delicate man-baby’s fragile little ego.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    His only strategy is to string this out on appeals and I guess ineffective counsel is one appeal? Not sure if that’s allowed in this type of case of if you’re the person who had possibly the most lawyers of all time.

    • khepri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      No appeals based on incompetent/ineffective counsel for a civil case. In a criminal case, a convicted defendant may appeal on the grounds of ineffectiveness of counsel at trial. This principal arises because of the constitutional right to be represented by counsel. Such a right would be meaningless unless it implies a right to effective counsel. There is no such constitutional right to counsel in a civil case, and therefore no such ground for appeal in a civil case.