• Metal Zealot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    How… how could you possibly start trying to profit off of a major resource for accessibility to movies. That’s scummier than scummy. Fuck you OpenSubtitles, you’re the fucking Elon Musk and Steve Huffman of deaf people everywhere. Get absolutely fucked.

    • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I swear I read a thread here (on lemmy) recently that one of these subtitle sites was embedding ads in the subtitles. Now that takes things even further than scummier in my opinion, especially since subtitles are for availability.

      • Petri@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Correct. They now embed ads directly into the subtitles. There is a python program to strip those ads out, but doesn’t work with Plex directly. It can be setup with bazarr, but that requires sonarr and or radar…

      • Metal Zealot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Oh, no harm done then, lets keep allowing every online resource to implement shitty money grabbing tactics

          • Metal Zealot@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            THEN ASK PEOPLE TO DONATE, how tone-deaf can you be about your own community?? What the fuck do they think Wikipedia is doing?
            I’ve found pirates & FOSS enthusiasts are FAR more likely to donate into something they use regularly and appreciate, this is a blatant slap in the face to those people.

          • Metal Zealot@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            This unfortunately helps sets a precedent for what the internet is going to look like in the future. Even the most basic things will be behind a paywall.
            You cant even read a fucking news article from New York Times, who made 173.91 million dollars last year

                  • Metal Zealot@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    You mean the world renowned, universally known news agency in America owned by billionaires?

              • Spazsquatch@lemmy.studio
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                True, but just look at how much better it has gotten in the last couple decades. Putting the news behind the paywall runs the risk of ending the battle for impressions and might force nuance into well researched stories.

          • kbal@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            But it’s been free for a really long time

            Of course it has. You need to offer the world a useful service for some length of time before you have dominated the market to such an extent that you can cut the quality and jack up the prices without there being any meaningful competition to worry about.

              • kbal@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                So who exactly does own OpenSubtitles Group Limited, and what are their motivations? If you’re claiming to know, I assume you must be some kind of insider? Because they don’t seem to be all that open about it. Otherwise we can only judge by their actions.