Yeah I bet we’d be in exactly the same position right now if non fascist infighting hadn’t handed republicans the house, senate, and presidency.
I’m sure kamala would have cut funding to everything useful and given executive power to elon musk and sold our national parks to the oil companies and built a private gestapo and legalized stopping brown people for being brown and put massive tariffs on everything and given the CDC to an evil dipshit and I’m sure a blue majority senate and house would have approved all of that.
Good thing everyone screaming about the genocide made so many people lose hope or it might still be going on.
Wait, trump did end the palastinian conflict, right?
Kamala could have won easily if she and the rest of the corporate dems stopped taking that AIPAC money, meaningfully opposed genocide, and did anything at all to address our absurd wealth disparity, they chose not to because the only thing they actually give a shit about is getting paid
You cannot blame voters for a reactions they had to a political party’s actions, especially when that action was to aid a genocidal campaign.
Although OP is being extreme by saying they are the same, so are you when you try to explain away the fucking shit show last election.
They could have told Israel to pound sand, instead they screwed us over. Stop scapegoating bro, the Democrats gave him the win when they started throwing punches at their own base.
We haven’t been a democracy since we allowed companies to buy politicians. We’ve had two sides to choose from, kind of, which are: ‘hardly does anything’ and ‘actively makes everything worse for everyone immediately’.
Genocide wasn’t on the ballot. Anyone who thought trump would stop it was wrong, as anyone who thought about it for a second had been telling them.
So now that those are out of the way, how does that idealistic high horse help every person whose life is now actively worse now?
Direct action does not mean “don’t also vote to make it harder for the fascists.”
Only two options were valid for the majority of election positions. We could have bought more time to fill local positions with third parties and progressives, but instead we’re building concentration camps and cutting any progress we’ve made in the last 20 years.
General strike at a bare minimum, which the government will almost certainly respond to violently anyway, so probably violent resistance whether we like it or not
Come on now dude. A link. That is shamefully lazy and nowhere as clever as you feel. Are you just another mindless drone that just happens to have latched on this flavour of radical political ideas? Could you just as well have stumbled across something else in those formative days and became a parrot of QAnon/MAGA? Since you make such strong statements, surely you are capable of explaining by yourself in your own words? Or is it all just identity and clout and memes and maybe some ChatGPT but really nothing more?
Not even against Trump?
not when they’re voting with trump and have said they don’t want to be an opposition party, no.
Yeah I bet we’d be in exactly the same position right now if non fascist infighting hadn’t handed republicans the house, senate, and presidency.
I’m sure kamala would have cut funding to everything useful and given executive power to elon musk and sold our national parks to the oil companies and built a private gestapo and legalized stopping brown people for being brown and put massive tariffs on everything and given the CDC to an evil dipshit and I’m sure a blue majority senate and house would have approved all of that.
Good thing everyone screaming about the genocide made so many people lose hope or it might still be going on.
Wait, trump did end the palastinian conflict, right?
Kamala could have won easily if she and the rest of the corporate dems stopped taking that AIPAC money, meaningfully opposed genocide, and did anything at all to address our absurd wealth disparity, they chose not to because the only thing they actually give a shit about is getting paid
You cannot blame voters for a reactions they had to a political party’s actions, especially when that action was to aid a genocidal campaign.
Although OP is being extreme by saying they are the same, so are you when you try to explain away the fucking shit show last election.
They could have told Israel to pound sand, instead they screwed us over. Stop scapegoating bro, the Democrats gave him the win when they started throwing punches at their own base.
wait, did kamala or biden say they didn’t support Israel?
Can you answer two questions for me.
What is the purpose of having a democracy?
Is it ever morally correct to affirmatively vote for a genocide?
We haven’t been a democracy since we allowed companies to buy politicians. We’ve had two sides to choose from, kind of, which are: ‘hardly does anything’ and ‘actively makes everything worse for everyone immediately’.
Genocide wasn’t on the ballot. Anyone who thought trump would stop it was wrong, as anyone who thought about it for a second had been telling them.
So now that those are out of the way, how does that idealistic high horse help every person whose life is now actively worse now?
so why are you trying to get people to engage in a sham, then? are you working with the fascists to try and dampen direct action?
Direct action does not mean “don’t also vote to make it harder for the fascists.” Only two options were valid for the majority of election positions. We could have bought more time to fill local positions with third parties and progressives, but instead we’re building concentration camps and cutting any progress we’ve made in the last 20 years.
So what is your solution? What is the plan?
General strike at a bare minimum, which the government will almost certainly respond to violently anyway, so probably violent resistance whether we like it or not
Do it then.
Moronic response, if any one person alone could just decide to make this shit happen it would have happened by now
Hop hop
Moronic response, try harder
Moronic response, try harder
they’ve decided against the ballot, so I guess the bullet.
And what will the results be? What is it you intend to achieve, short term and long term?
liberation for the people, and liberation for the people.
Can you expand in more informative terms than clever soundbites?
yes.
https://anarchistfaq.org/afaq/index.html
Come on now dude. A link. That is shamefully lazy and nowhere as clever as you feel. Are you just another mindless drone that just happens to have latched on this flavour of radical political ideas? Could you just as well have stumbled across something else in those formative days and became a parrot of QAnon/MAGA? Since you make such strong statements, surely you are capable of explaining by yourself in your own words? Or is it all just identity and clout and memes and maybe some ChatGPT but really nothing more?
Lol are you paying attention