This is silly. There is a meaningful difference between bourgeois democracy and fascism.
There is a meaningful difference between the handle and the axehead.
Isn’t there? The handle is basically just a stick.
There is a difference. But they are part of the same tool.
Therefore drawing the distinction isn’t particularly poignant.
Even if you’re a tree, and the handle is made of wood.
A stick is an essential part of an axe but not a sufficient one. And the same handle can be used to make different tools. Axes, hammers, mallets, etc. And you can use a stick for non aggressive tasks, like a measurement stick, or a door prop, or a tiny pole for a tiny tent for Chihuahuas. And even when used as a weapon, well you tell me if you’d rather battle a fighter wielding an axe or one wielding just the handle of an axe.
we’re listening
Your line is the soviet line before Barbarossa. Are we really going to re-litigate WW2 here?
Edit: lol, you want a meme? The top panel would be the bourgeois/Democrats+traditional-GOP using a water cannon on the working class. The bottom panel would be the fascists/MAGA-Republicans using an actual cannon. Like I said, a meaningful difference.
Edit2: your meme by the way, absolutely accurate up until about 2024.
Is this badly timed or intentional to fracture the not-fascists in America? Priorities, people. Don’t fight your allies when you are at war with a common enemy that is about to destroy all of you.
liberals are not our allies.
Not even against Trump?
not when they’re voting with trump and have said they don’t want to be an opposition party, no.
Yeah I bet we’d be in exactly the same position right now if non fascist infighting hadn’t handed republicans the house, senate, and presidency.
I’m sure kamala would have cut funding to everything useful and given executive power to elon musk and sold our national parks to the oil companies and built a private gestapo and legalized stopping brown people for being brown and put massive tariffs on everything and given the CDC to an evil dipshit and I’m sure a blue majority senate and house would have approved all of that.
Good thing everyone screaming about the genocide made so many people lose hope or it might still be going on.
Wait, trump did end the palastinian conflict, right?
Kamala could have won easily if she and the rest of the corporate dems stopped taking that AIPAC money, meaningfully opposed genocide, and did anything at all to address our absurd wealth disparity, they chose not to because the only thing they actually give a shit about is getting paid
You cannot blame voters for a reactions they had to a political party’s actions, especially when that action was to aid a genocidal campaign.
Although OP is being extreme by saying they are the same, so are you when you try to explain away the fucking shit show last election.
They could have told Israel to pound sand, instead they screwed us over. Stop scapegoating bro, the Democrats gave him the win when they started throwing punches at their own base.
Wait, trump did end the palastinian conflict, right?
wait, did kamala or biden say they didn’t support Israel?
Can you answer two questions for me.
What is the purpose of having a democracy?
Is it ever morally correct to affirmatively vote for a genocide?
-
We haven’t been a democracy since we allowed companies to buy politicians. We’ve had two sides to choose from, kind of, which are: ‘hardly does anything’ and ‘actively makes everything worse for everyone immediately’.
-
Genocide wasn’t on the ballot. Anyone who thought trump would stop it was wrong, as anyone who thought about it for a second had been telling them.
So now that those are out of the way, how does that idealistic high horse help every person whose life is now actively worse now?
We haven’t been a democracy since we allowed companies to buy politicians.
so why are you trying to get people to engage in a sham, then? are you working with the fascists to try and dampen direct action?
-
So what is your solution? What is the plan?
General strike at a bare minimum, which the government will almost certainly respond to violently anyway, so probably violent resistance whether we like it or not
Do it then.
Moronic response, if any one person alone could just decide to make this shit happen it would have happened by now
they’ve decided against the ballot, so I guess the bullet.
And what will the results be? What is it you intend to achieve, short term and long term?
liberation for the people, and liberation for the people.
Lol are you paying attention
I think you scratched a few liberals.
you spelled nazis wrong!







