I doubt it, simply because first responders aren’t obliged to leave you passed out on the floor waiting to die.

Beyond that, they are taking proper steps to ensure their health at least in the short term. Water with electrolytes, and vitamins.

I mean, kinda?

Please stop assaulting me, you’re breaking the law.

See how easy it is to just say things?

But then could it not just be recirculated? I’m not understand why we are assuming we pull out of the tap, and dump into the sewer, when that sounds incredibly costly. Would they not just… dump into a cooling tank, then reuse when down to temp?

I’m also confused on how they are “consuming” the water. I’m guessing they aren’t closed loop like most later cooling, but are they just… using it till it evaporates? I legitimately don’t understand where this water goes that it’s just… gone?

Just imagine how utterly fucked this woman’s life is. Gone for 6 weeks. Does she still have her job? Does she still have a place to live? Does she still qualify for her school credits? Not to mention, her name and general location are public knowledge.

I can’t see how her life isn’t utterly fucked.

They’ve moved away from touch centric controls, and are “slowly” moving things into the modern settings. I never claimed their shit was clean, just moving in what seems to be the right direction, for the most part.

<.<

We have an excel. It’s more… a group of excels? They call each other. Opening and running VBA within each other. The excels are “run” nightly, and take well over an hour to do their thing.

Should we just keep it in Excel?

I agree option 1 is the correct choice, though it does appear they are slowly going that direction… very slowly.

But they definitely didn’t spend millions, nevermind billions, on shoehorning this one extra feature into their existing AI models.

Closed you hold it like a phone. Open you hold it like a tablet. I’m not sure how else to help here. >.>

I don’t believe you.

“Written by software” does not inherently mean AI.

Any random individual? Maybe not. But one man bands exist and are completely reliant on this concept.

Quick question, is stopping a serial killer sexist if the killer happens to be a woman?

That’s a fair point actually. Though it would still be meaningless with republican decent.

Haven’t we blown past two different “this is the end” limits previously set? And we just keep making new ones?

I dunno, it really sounds like we’re fucked.

Funny, their lawyers say otherwise:

according to the lawyers, their families weren’t given a choice, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers stalled their efforts to make arrangements for the children, ensuring they would be sent away with their mothers.

Now, who is more likely to lie… multiple individuals who have zero connection to each other, or an administration which has been caught lying before and is headed by a convicted felon.

I get the point but this will just result in a “official act” response and a hand wave.

You clearly missed the point of that scene.

He just doesn’t have the stamina needed to be president.