me like use nano. nano say how do thing. nano exit easy.

  • AlbatrossFanboy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t get why there’s so much prejudice towards nano users in the Linux community, people act like nano is useless but it performs its job well, and it does it without being large or overly complicated.

  • Francislewwis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Honestly nano is perfect for quick edits. Vim and Emacs are powerful, but sometimes you just want to open a config file, change one line, and exit without fighting the editor. 😄

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Vim does not just work if you don’t know how to get into edit mode and save and quit from there. Nano even has built in search and replace.

        • creation7758@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Funny story, when i first got into linux (almost a decade ago), I accidentally opened nano pasting some random command off the internet and didn’t know how to close it because I didn’t know what the ^ symbol meant.

          I had successfully been quiting (and using) vim for a few months at this point.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    180
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    The image is misleading. The brain sizes represent the amount of grey matter it takes to operate the editor. The nano guy has plenty of brain power left over for things like hygiene, breathing and basic reasoning.

  • Cevilia (they/she/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Fortunately, every computer comes equipped with an “exit editor” button. It’s on the back, attached to the power supply unit. You just flick the switch. Exits every editor known to humanity. /j

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    nano is usually built in. Adding another one is just redundant if all you’re using it for is editing an occasional config file.

    Honestly never understood the hate for it. Who cares? Petty, stupid, nerd-wars over little crap like a text editor is the reason average people don’t even consider linux.

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I see vim preinstalled more than nano (e.g. in container images). I’ve been trying to convert to micro, though. It has better support for terminal emulators than nano.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I very rarely see people hate nano (except a few comments in this thread), and I always see nano recommended as the text editor when people give advice on doing things in the command line

  • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I do appreciate this in nano. It helps me complete the new container config occasionally required to install vim.

    • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m team nano, I’m not smart enough to use the other two and for whenever I need to open a text file in terminal only environment once every year I can remember how to navigate nano. So I’ll keep using nano.

      • It has nothing to do with intelligence. vi and emacs are just rote memorization and also endless installation of plugins and configuration. They are slow to pick up, but very powerful and also ergonomic once you know what to do.

        A modern GUI like CSCode is faster to pickup and immediately very powerful.

        A good emacs or vim configuration tailored to your needs can stay with you for decades. It’s stable, reliable, and does everything already. vim has released less than one point update per year for more than 2 years. During that time Sublime and VSCode had dozens, if not hundreds.

        For most people the choice of editor doesn’t make a huge difference. They spend far more time reading than writing code.

        Nano is the right choice for you.

      • Mika@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I use emacs but it’s only convenient to me with a lot of custom stuff on top. Vanilla emacs tho, hell no.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yes. It’s newby-friendly, what is great for the time every 2 or 3 years that it opens in my face and there’s no alternative editor installed.

      Copy and paste are there too, but there’s no reason to use them instead of the terminal buffer, so I can edit things in an editor I like. I just wish it made it easier to delete several lines at the same time.

  • smh@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I love nano. I used to do tech support for a Linux-based content management system (before SAaS take took off)… The customer sysadmins were sometimes whichever engineer was volun-told to do it, so competency varied wildly.

    I helped mostly with installs. This might be the poor newbie sysadmin’s first time on the command line. Nano was my go-to suggestion for editing config files–all the commands are right there! Much less intimidating than vi or emacs for a newbie.

  • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Linux text editor discourse has been baffling to me for decades now. I don’t care which you use, and I care even less about why.