• tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    For the lefty women, this is awful. For the righty women: this is what you voted for, suck it up and carry that dead baby.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      Come on, be better than them. No woman deserves to suffer through this even if they voted against their own best interests.

      • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s horrid, I know. To have a dead baby inside you and to suddenly find that anti-abortion lawmaker you so gleefully supported is preventing you from removing its lifeless body. Who could have known, right? Maybe if we pray?

        Maybe going through that will give them the missing empathy they needed to be a decent human being

          • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            39
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            At this point, in 2023, we are on the verge of an authoritarian takeover. We lost RvW, next is same sex marriage, then voting rights, and boom! Back to pre 1920. So forgive me if I’m not particularly sad when leopards devour someone’s face.

          • Bananigans@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            2 years ago

            You’re not describing empathy. It sounds like the person you’re responding to already knows how bad that outcome is which is why they’re against authoritarian law to begin with. You’re just more sympathetic towards people facing the consequences of their own decisions. Which is fine. But that crowd already used up all of mine over COVID. And climate change is just around the corner. Glad you still have some sympathy left to go around for leopard victims.

          • Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s not time to be empathetic, it’s time for you fucking Americans to get mad. To riot against your rights being stripped.

          • Crikeste@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Their entire platform is to lack empathy, and they voted for it.

            I’m not gonna pretend to care about them, simply because they couldn’t care about anyone else.

      • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        The thing is, I don’t really care what people “deserve”, or what they “don’t deserve”. How should I know? I’ll be a dork and quote Tolkien: “Many that live deserve death. Some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them, Frodo? Do not be too eager to deal out death in judgment.”

        But I do care about who’s in the pact. We have an agreement, between us, we decent people. We watch out for each other. We protect each other. Or if we can’t, when something terrible is done to somebody, at the very least, we speak out, in protest, in sympathy, in sorrow. And the people covered by this pact, as far as I’m concerned, are the people who follow it - that’s it, the sole criteria for membership, about the lowest bar possible.

        I’m not going to force somebody to carry a dead fetus because they forced other people to do so, but when the cruel laws they always thought would only apply to other people suddenly apply to them, I don’t owe them my sympathy either. They aren’t in the pact.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Frank Wilhoit: “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition… There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

          Which is why you and others here are disturbing me quite a bit right now.

          • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Hmm, a quote I quite like myself. Let’s see. I have defined two groups. I have not suggested that either group should not be bound by the law, nor that either group should by better protected by the law than the other. In fact, this entire part of the discussion is predicated on the law, which one group has imposed on the other, applying equally.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Then shouldn’t the call be “let’s change the law so none of these women suffer” rather than “it’s good if the women who voted for the people who changed the law suffer for it?”

      • guacupado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Trying to be better is why conservatives are fucking us as much as they are.

        Fuck that. Those women who voted for this fucking deserve it.

      • rosymind@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m with you on this. I worry that too mamy people cheer on the pain of the “other” without realizing that in doing so they become the worst of what they hate

        People make bad decisions, but then some of them grow. To tell them that they deserve their pain, just because they didn’t understand what it was they were doing, is pretty fucked up

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Eh. If they genuinely have a change of heart and are horrified at their previous self, we can afford to show grace. If they go right back to supporting Republicans, fuck them.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        They have a change of heart but years later after they are past the age to have kids they go right back. The number of older women trying to take away the rights they enjoyed is disgusting.

        • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I appreciate the intent of your correction. For most abortions, yes, blastocyst. I’m not an expert, but I think that the body will usually safely flush out a failed blastocyst, and as the article said, many of these absolute nightmare scenarios cannot be diagnosed until well past that stage, so in this context, I think fetus is correct.

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Women of America: I urge you- go on a baby boycott! Deny these scumbags children until these draconian laws are lifted.

    • Efwis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not to mention the cold-hearted attacks on these mothers for trying to protect their own lives since they know they can’t enjoy having the pleasure of being a parent to these children.

      This country, especially the southern states, don’t care about anything but themselves and controlling others.

      I’m so glad the wife and I are actively trying to get out of Texas. It’s not a place I want to raise a family as there are no real family values offered here except hate and control.

    • MTLion3@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s even more bizarre when women vote for / agree with this shit. What woman actually wants to go through this or thinks it’s necessary?

      • pezhore@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 years ago

        Don’t you know? All those abortions you hear about are for evil hussies who can’t stop getting with men.

        But if I have complications, I get to still have a medical procedure to terminate my pregnancy, right?

        /s

        https://archive.is/eLE8g

        • MTLion3@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          2 years ago

          Awww shit, you right. I forgot that women are all just cum sluts and men are perfect angels who do nothing wrong ever. Good wholesome folks will have access to abortions if they’re life threatening without issue, suuuuurely

  • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    Every pregnancy is so taxing on the body, and can have a huge impact on a woman’s future health. To make women go through it against their will, or for a child that won’t live/have any quality of life is evil and vile. Sometimes, I wish their God were real, just so these fuckers can get to the pearly gates and get booted straight down to hell for all eternity.

  • febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Might as well implement Sharia law in some US states. You’re not far behind the Taliban.