• Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    >Visit a park for free

    > Realize that you’re theoretically owing everyone in town roughly $0.01 for your “free” stay

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      They make their money by investing mine. In return, they provide me a safe place for my cash and financial services. Fair deal. I’m OK with that.

      Having said that, fuck banks for private individuals. Go credit union, all the way. And while we’re at it, call your bank and tell them you don’t want overdraft protection. They have to turn off the NSF fees, and that’s not my opinion and it’s not negotiable. It’s law in the US.

          • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yes! And Community Land Trusts. I don’t know what this political position is called but I totally support it. Perhaps ‘Fairtrade Capitalism?’

          • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Wait, as a bank? I’m suprised your uni has one as I expected them to be quite hard to run. Wouldn’t you need to employ a couple of good economists to invest the money, keep a part liquid, etc. for you?

            • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’ve seen a handful of "university of [place name] credit union"s I imagine it’s a case of “we already do some financial products, might as well cut out the middle man and make it a branch of the business”

              I also worked at a regional bank with about 20 locations. Out of the 120 or so employees most were tellers and branch managers, then only about a dozen were behind the desk people doing literally everything else keeping the lights on, so in terms of headcount it doesn’t take that many people to run a small bank. Hardest part is raising the capital to get a bank charter (I think that’s like 10 million dollars for a single location last I looked)

    • PatMustard@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Bank accounts, you mean the one place most people specifically do get interest, the opposite of what this post is pointing out?

  • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    My employer sells “stocks” to employees that don’t show anywhere and you can only sell them back to the company after two year. Exchange also isn’t immediate. Company chooses the date.

    They really want people to buy those things and are heavily campaigning for it.

    They also give a small amount of these stocks as bonuses to people that have performed well.

    When I say to people that buying those “stocks” just gives the company free loan, they look at me weird.

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes, stock is basically a loan to the company. Sure, if a company always new it was going to grow at a certain rate and life were guaranteed they could give everyone an exact raise…

      Instead they say “here is a bonus, its built on a gamble. Here’s is monopoly money that might be worth 10% more in two years, or maybe the company will be bankrupt and you will be unemployed.”

      Would it be better to get a cash bonus or a raise of similar value? Sure.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    As an accountant I’ve listened to several colleagues talk for hours about dialing in their W-2’s, some even under withholding and making quarterly payments to make up the difference. Calculating exactly what they are saving and investing that into a seperate account.

    Probably spending more in fees than they’re saving. Let alone the time invested. I’m perfectly fine with the government slowly accumulating 1% of my income extra over the course of a year and sending it back later personally.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Reminds me of one of the ‘warnings’ they gave us in basic training - tldr is that the folks in finance are just as dumb as the rest of us, and invariably there are a couple recruits in every batch that have their first paycheck MAJORLY fucked up.

    Like, instead of the $400 we’re supposed to get, we’d get like $40,000 cuz of some fat-finger fuckup in Excel.

    The warning was “DO NOT TOUCH a single cent of money you’re not supposed to have, cuz they WILL notice and you WILL have to pay it back!”

    …which in my mind translated to: “If you win the finance fuckery lottery, all your loans just became 0% interest!!”

    I was not one of the lucky ones. Q_Q

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Don’t know how that works with the feds, but I worked IT for a private payroll firm. If we fucked up and put extra money in your account, that was your money. We had no means of taking it back. None.

      Imagine the possible scams if it wasn’t that way!

      Caveat: If the bank fucks up and deposits too much, while that’s on them, you don’t get to keep the funds.

      I’ll note: American employees, while not having the protections we should have, probably get more than you think. If you start work for us and I send you a $3,500 MacBook, and you quit next week? LOL, keep it. HR can’t hold your last check or any other such thing.

      • Darrell_Winfield@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Was the benefactor of finance mistake in military. It’s not your money, it’s the government’s. They take it back. You have no defense and no rights.

        Bonus is if they screw up and give you $25k extra like they did me, you can pay it back as 10% of your base income, interest free. Turned out to be a 0% interest 3 year car loan for me!

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    So I’d make a few bucks in interest off it. I’d rather give it to them for a nice little payday around March and to not have the stress of trying to hit close to zero without owing.

  • JPJones@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Doesn’t matter. You’d have spent it on bullshit, anyways, but now you have a nice chunk to blow all at once!

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      See facts like this make me wonder if a Norway style sovereign wealth fund could be developed to close the gaps in people’s quality of life and what they’ve put into working.

      It’s not like the US is short on natural resource wealth to invest as the principle, and put together with a restructured tax regime it could significantly reduce the net burden for most americans, and especially the most misfortuned americans.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    While this might be correct, I disagree with this as a philosophy.

    A) most people in this country don’t have cash reserves to pay an underpaid tax bill.

    B) most people don’t have the investment acumen to properly invest monies not withheld on taxes to benefit from not paying as much on their income.

    C) They just spend the money because most Americans live paycheck to paycheck, and because A and B.

    So for most people I would say that judicious overpayment of tax on the W4 resulting in a minor or modest tax refund is probably better all-around. That money will go right back into the economy or pay off some debt.

  • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    This assumes tax return is because of over-withholding. If you’re like me with a young family and low-ish income you pay $0 in federal taxes and get a bunch back for EIC, child tax credits, etc. I’m just excited because I’ll be able to fully pay off some of the debts that have been hanging over me and largely not shrinking at all next month

    • YAMAPIKARIYA@lemmyfi.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m gonna be straight. In reality I’m absolutely fine with taxes. It’s just funny to think about it as in the meme.

    • gutternonsense@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      What type of wages? W2? 1099? Or self employed? Or something the regular person or even upper middle class wouldn’t even know about :)