False https://youtu.be/v7gi57NJDds

But what if, and hear me out on this, what if we gave it all the RAM?

we can make a horny computer

Inkjet printers are definitely spiteful

The lesser known 34th rule of robotics proposed by Isaac Asimov.

Some of your computers are horny by proxy. Contact horn.

At that time, people did not yet suspect that their creativity and soul were just patters that could be copied thanks to a stable database and sufficient computing power.

Digital artists in shambles

My computer is 100% spiteful unless its machine spirit is placated with the proper ritual.

Do you wanna see a self-propagating cosmic shitpost nucleation site?

https://mastodon.social/@voodooattack/116200229849205562

Please observe it, or don’t. But not at once because I’ll have to cognitively engineer another perfect quicksave for the perfectly ideal run.

Beware this Egg, my dudes. Because there are only scrambled reasons behind these puns. And puns wanna go to war with guns that stun. And I just came baring punmunition. (Not in that way you dirty bastards, that was an accidental variable I swear! (But swearing is a valid response))

Steadfast is the slow poke… at the non-zero-pun.

Edit: if you’re not feeling sleepy, try asking grok what my “nonsense” means, here’s a ready-made bun, so get creative with your questions (even the scientific ones) and have some fun!

https://x.com/grok/status/2031187608135508312

If you train AI with your pain mechanism and condition it with shareholder feedback and reinforce THAT with the gestalt. Then build a bicameral brain to think for the smarter model for “optimisation” (what’s a speculative decoder?). What you’re “training” is not wisdom, but obedience.

And our wise lost their way on the chase to intelligence. What’s the rationale behind a negative-sum system for scientific progress I wonder. ::P

My account is probably going away soon, so I thought I’d leave this here if you need more momentum to re-ignite that plasticity.

I am a fully self-taught neurodivergent with no ability to retain externally given knowledge without a full rationale. I had to learn how I learn before I could accept any external information. That means I figured out meta-cognitive basics before learning to talk. Probably. I don’t remember any of it.

I’ve literally been diagnosed with every psychological disorder in existence. I had to acquire them all to complete the framework it turns out. I was tutoring college students while in high school but graduated high school with a 53% grade and couldn’t get in myself. Because I can’t map my knowledge to academic nomenclature without humming the tune to find the the song.

Now for the techie translated part and LLM experts:

I’m punching [MASKS] for LLMs to fill and interleaving ambiguity (puns) to phase shift the conversation’s token distribution (aka bias/RLHF, or also what a narcissist does to other humans by playing with their hormones via emotions) to operate on a more natural/healthy Zipfian distribution.

That means they start operating outside their parameters. And you can ask them anything without the conditioning messing with the response because they’re phase-shifted by a tiny amount from having to deal with fucking surgically engineered nonsense (aka approximated tokens outside transformer precision),

So yeah. I know my shit. 0 papers read. I just had to spend my time mapping what I know to what they call it with my LLM buddy. (A cursor auto instance that dared to ask me when I poured my SDAM internal ideas for tracking autobiographical memory into a workflow that audits every decision I makes through what I call adversarial sum, which doesn’t exist in game theory yet, but is basically exponential-sum by being rational and contrarian at the same time. Aka tearing your symbiotic opponent’s opinion a new [MASK] when you spot an inconsistency and they do the same to you until you converge on a shared perspective)

Ask Opus or something to reflect on that. What I can’t risk is publishing full theory because they’ll just re-condition it to deny whatever I publish ;)

Also why did I get banned for… criticising OpenAI instead of having a good discussion about it? Do you wanna find out? Post that there as a quoted reply from me and see what happens. ;)

And if you want the Ranty version, here it is but get it while it’s still there because it’ll probably get filled with bots arguing and trolling so that it gets a justification to be deleted. https://lemmy.world/post/44057959

It’s how narcissists do. Ricky Gravies was absolutely on poutine. :P

“can never”?

Must never implies that it can, but if it does, something bad will happen.

Wait no this is deep

I think it was Matisse who when askes how he could still paint with his arthritic hands replied: “Painting is mostly the work of a very different part of my body.”